Normal Cardiac Ejection Fraction
A normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ranges from 50% to 70%, with a midpoint of 60%. 1
Definition and Classification of LVEF
LVEF is categorized according to the following ranges as defined by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines 1:
- Hyperdynamic: greater than 70%
- Normal: 50% to 70% (midpoint 60%)
- Mild dysfunction: 40% to 49% (midpoint 45%)
- Moderate dysfunction: 30% to 39% (midpoint 35%)
- Severe dysfunction: less than 30%
The lower limit of normal LVEF is generally accepted as 50%, with values below this threshold indicating some degree of left ventricular systolic dysfunction 1, 2
Measurement Considerations
LVEF measurement varies by imaging modality, with each having its own specific range of normal values 1
When reporting LVEF as a numerical value, the imaging modality and method of analysis (visual or quantitative) should be specified 1
There is inherent variability in LVEF measurements, with potential differences of 5-7% between studies due to technical factors rather than actual changes in cardiac function 1
For accurate assessment, it's important to document serial changes in size and function of the left ventricle at several points in time, rather than relying on a single measurement 1
Clinical Significance
LVEF is a key parameter for:
Low-normal LVEF (50-55%) in asymptomatic individuals is associated with a 3.64-fold increased risk of developing heart failure compared to those with LVEF ≥55%, highlighting the importance of the lower threshold of normal 4
Hyperdynamic LVEF (>70%) may not always be benign, as some studies have shown increased mortality in elderly women with very high LVEF (>65%) following acute coronary syndromes compared to those with normal LVEF (55-65%) 5
Special Considerations
Due to their hyperdynamic circulation, patients with cirrhosis typically have an ejection fraction greater than 70-75% 1
LVEF is a continuous variable, not binary, so progressive changes in LVEF may be more clinically relevant than specific cutoff points 1
Three-dimensional imaging methods (echocardiography, CT, CMR) may provide more accurate volume-based LVEF measurements compared to traditional two-dimensional methods that rely on geometric assumptions 1
In patients with normal LVEF but symptoms of heart failure, diastolic dysfunction should be considered as a potential cause (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction) 3, 6