What is a normal ejection fraction (EF) in adults?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 13, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Normal Ejection Fraction in Adults

A normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in adults ranges from 50% to 70%, with a midpoint of 60%. 1, 2

Standard Reference Ranges

The established normal LVEF values vary slightly depending on the measurement method and guideline source:

  • ACC/AHA Guidelines: Normal LVEF is 50-70% (midpoint 60%) 1, 2
  • European Society of Cardiology: Normal range is 53-73% (mean 63 ± 5%) using the biplane method of discs, regardless of age, gender, or body size 1
  • Lower limit of normal: Generally accepted as 50%, with values below this indicating some degree of left ventricular systolic dysfunction 2

LVEF Classification Categories

The ACC/AHA guidelines classify LVEF as follows:

  • Hyperdynamic: Greater than 70% 1, 2
  • Normal: 50% to 70% 1, 2
  • Mildly reduced: 40% to 49% (also called "low normal" when 50-55%) 1, 2
  • Moderately reduced: 30% to 39% 1, 2
  • Severely reduced: Less than 30% 1, 2

Measurement Method Considerations

The biplane method of discs (modified Simpson's rule) is the recommended measurement technique, obtained from apical four-chamber and two-chamber views, as it is particularly reliable in abnormally shaped ventricles. 1

Different imaging modalities have specific normal ranges:

  • 2D Echocardiography (Biplane Simpson's): 53-73% (mean 63 ± 5%) 1
  • 3D Echocardiography: 52-72% for women (mean 62 ± 5%) 1
  • Radionuclide ventriculography, MRI, and contrast ventriculography are also preferred modalities for quantitative LVEF measurement 1

Important Clinical Caveats

LVEF measurement varies between imaging modalities and interpreters, with potential differences of 5-7% between studies due to technical factors rather than actual changes in cardiac function. 1, 2

Key pitfalls to avoid:

  • A single LVEF measurement may not be adequate, particularly for borderline values (41-49% or 50-55%), and serial measurements using the same equipment and methodology are recommended 1, 2
  • LVEF is load-dependent and cannot distinguish between preload, afterload, and intrinsic contractility 1
  • Higher LVEF does not always mean better cardiac function—values >70% may indicate hypovolemia, small ventricular cavity, or compensatory mechanisms rather than superior function 1
  • Low normal LVEF (50-55%) carries increased risk: in asymptomatic adults, this range is associated with 3.64-fold increased risk of incident heart failure compared to LVEF ≥55%, though not increased mortality 3

Special Population Considerations

  • Patients with cirrhosis: Typically have hyperdynamic circulation with EF greater than 70-75%, so an EF >60% may be more appropriate as a cutoff for normal in this population 4
  • Elderly women: More commonly present with heart failure and preserved EF (≥50%), often with systolic hypertension as the underlying cause 5, 6
  • Very high EF (>65%) in elderly women after acute coronary syndrome is paradoxically associated with increased mortality compared to normal EF (55-65%) 7

When to Consider Alternative Assessment

When EF appears preserved but dysfunction is suspected, consider global longitudinal strain (GLS), with normal values being more negative than -16%; values less negative than -16% indicate mild depression, and less negative than -10% indicate severe reduction. 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.