What is the difference in management between a patient with an S3 heart sound and one with an S4 heart sound?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 13, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management Differences Between S3 and S4 Heart Sounds

The management of patients with S3 heart sounds should focus on treating heart failure, while management of patients with S4 heart sounds should target the underlying cause such as hypertension or coronary artery disease.

Characteristics and Clinical Significance

S3 Heart Sound

  • S3 is a mid-diastolic heart sound that occurs during the rapid filling phase of ventricular diastole 1
  • Presence of S3 is highly specific for heart failure and indicates cardiac decompensation 2, 3
  • S3 is associated with elevated left ventricular filling pressures and volume overload 1
  • Electronic detection of S3 has shown 93% specificity for decompensated heart failure 3

S4 Heart Sound

  • S4 is a late-diastolic heart sound that occurs during atrial contraction 1
  • S4 is most frequently found in patients with coronary heart disease and is a constant finding in hypertension 2
  • Unlike S3, S4 does not necessarily indicate heart failure but rather increased resistance to ventricular filling 2
  • S4 can be eliminated with pressure on the stethoscope, unlike ejection sounds or split first heart sounds 2

Management Approach for S3

Primary Management Focus

  • Treat the underlying heart failure as S3 is a reliable indicator of cardiac decompensation 2, 3
  • Implement standard heart failure therapy including diuretics, ACE inhibitors/ARBs, beta-blockers, and aldosterone antagonists 1

Monitoring and Assessment

  • Monitor jugular venous pressure, which is often elevated in patients with S3 1
  • Assess for other signs of heart failure such as pulmonary rales, peripheral edema, and hepatomegaly 1
  • Consider BNP/NT-proBNP measurement, as combining S3 detection with BNP levels improves diagnostic accuracy 3
  • Evaluate for presence of S3 during follow-up as its disappearance may indicate improvement in heart failure status 4

Diagnostic Workup

  • Perform echocardiography to assess ventricular function, as S3 correlates with systolic and diastolic dysfunction 1
  • Consider cardiac acoustic biomarker monitoring as part of heart failure management strategy 4

Management Approach for S4

Primary Management Focus

  • Target the underlying cause rather than heart failure itself 2
  • Manage hypertension aggressively if present, as S4 is a constant finding in hypertensive patients 2
  • Address ischemic heart disease if suspected, as S4 is frequently associated with coronary artery disease 2

Monitoring and Assessment

  • Monitor blood pressure control, as improved blood pressure management may lead to resolution of S4 1, 2
  • Assess for left ventricular hypertrophy, which is commonly associated with S4 1
  • Evaluate for diastolic dysfunction, which may be present even with preserved ejection fraction 1

Diagnostic Workup

  • Consider stress testing or coronary evaluation if coronary artery disease is suspected 2
  • Perform echocardiography to assess for left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic function 1

Special Considerations

Combined S3 and S4

  • When both S3 and S4 are present (quadruple rhythm), this suggests cardiac decompensation in a patient with underlying coronary or hypertensive heart disease 2
  • Management should address both heart failure and the underlying condition 2
  • In some cases, when S3 and S4 occur simultaneously, they create a summation gallop that can be misinterpreted as a valvular lesion 2

Diagnostic Challenges

  • Interobserver agreement on the presence of S3 is moderate at best (kappa = 0.40-0.50), making electronic detection potentially more reliable 5, 3
  • S3 and S4 can be difficult to detect in patients with emphysematous chests; listening over the xiphoid or epigastric area may help 2
  • Advanced technologies like Hilbert-Huang Transform can improve detection of these subtle heart sounds 6

Prognostic Implications

  • S3 is associated with worse outcomes in heart failure patients and should prompt aggressive management 3, 4
  • S4, while not necessarily indicating heart failure, may signal increased risk for developing heart failure if the underlying condition is not addressed 2
  • Regular monitoring of cardiac acoustic biomarkers including S3 and S4 may provide valuable information for ongoing management of cardiac patients 4

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.