What are the differences between Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD), Metabolic Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD), and Metabolic Associated Steatohepatitis with Liver Disease (MASLD)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Differentiation Between NAFLD, MAFLD, and MASLD

MASLD (Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease) is the current preferred terminology that replaces NAFLD, requiring the presence of hepatic steatosis plus at least one cardiometabolic risk factor, while MAFLD was a transitional term with similar diagnostic criteria but has now been superseded by MASLD. 1

Key Definitions and Diagnostic Criteria

NAFLD (Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease)

  • Traditional term defined by the presence of hepatic steatosis in the absence of significant alcohol consumption (>21 standard drinks/week for men, >14 standard drinks/week for women) 1
  • Diagnosis of exclusion that required ruling out other causes of liver steatosis 1
  • Includes a spectrum from simple steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and fibrosis/cirrhosis 1
  • Criticized for its negative definition (based on what it is not) and potential stigmatizing language 1

MAFLD (Metabolic dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease)

  • Transitional term proposed to replace NAFLD, focusing on the metabolic etiology 1
  • Required hepatic steatosis plus at least one metabolic risk factor (obesity, type 2 diabetes, or metabolic dysregulation) 2
  • Provided a positive diagnostic criterion rather than an exclusion-based definition 1, 3
  • Has been superseded by MASLD in the most recent guidelines 1

MASLD (Metabolic dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease)

  • Current preferred terminology established in June 2023 through an international, multi-society guided Delphi process 1
  • Defined as the presence of hepatic steatosis (documented by imaging or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic risk factor 1
  • Includes the full spectrum from simple steatosis (MASL) to steatohepatitis (MASH) and fibrosis/cirrhosis 1
  • Embedded within the broader concept of steatotic liver disease (SLD) 1

Diagnostic Framework and Classification

Steatotic Liver Disease (SLD) Categories

  • MASLD: Steatosis + cardiometabolic risk factor(s) + no harmful alcohol intake 1
  • MetALD: MASLD with moderate alcohol intake (20-50g/day in women, 30-60g/day in men) 1
  • ALD: Alcohol-related liver disease (>50g/day in women, >60g/day in men) 1
  • Other causes: Drug-induced, monogenic diseases, etc. 1

Cardiometabolic Risk Factors for MASLD Diagnosis

  • Type 2 diabetes 1
  • Obesity (especially with additional metabolic risk factors) 1
  • Metabolic dysregulation (prediabetes, atherogenic dyslipidemia, hypertension) 1

Clinical Implications and Population Overlap

Population Overlap Between Definitions

  • Nearly complete overlap between NAFLD and MASLD populations (99.8% accordance in tertiary NAFLD cohorts) 1
  • Only 5.3% of individuals with NAFLD in the NHANESIII database did not fulfill MASLD criteria 1
  • MASLD identifies a greater number of individuals compared to MAFLD, particularly those with BMI <25 kg/m² 4, 5
  • Both MASLD and MAFLD are associated with increased all-cause mortality risk, while NAFLD alone showed no such association 4

Clinical and Prognostic Considerations

  • Clinical characteristics between NAFLD and MASLD are almost identical 1
  • Non-invasive tests show equal accuracy and similar cut-offs for both NAFLD and MASLD definitions 1
  • Long-term follow-up shows similar mortality rates, with slightly higher mortality in MASLD compared to NAFLD 1
  • Advanced fibrosis is associated with increased mortality risk regardless of terminology used (NAFLD, MAFLD, or MASLD) 4

Practical Approach to Diagnosis

Diagnostic Algorithm

  1. Identify hepatic steatosis through imaging or biopsy 1
  2. Assess for cardiometabolic risk factors 1
  3. Evaluate alcohol consumption patterns using detailed medical history and validated biomarkers 1
  4. Rule out other specific etiologies of steatosis 1
  5. Apply appropriate terminology based on findings 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Failing to assess alcohol consumption quantitatively and qualitatively 1
  • Not considering the overlap between metabolic risk and alcohol consumption (MetALD) 1
  • Overlooking the need for fibrosis assessment, which is the strongest predictor of outcomes 4
  • Using outdated terminology that may stigmatize patients or fail to recognize the metabolic etiology 1

Clinical Management Implications

  • Evidence generated under the NAFLD definition can be fully extrapolated to individuals with MASLD 1
  • Management focuses on lifestyle modification, weight loss, and addressing metabolic comorbidities regardless of terminology 1
  • New pharmacological treatments (e.g., resmetirom) are being evaluated specifically for MASH with significant fibrosis 1
  • Screening strategies should target high-risk populations with cardiometabolic risk factors 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

[NAFLD renaming to MAFLD, MASLD: background, similarities, differences, and countermeasures].

Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology, 2023

Research

Comparison of NAFLD, MAFLD and MASLD characteristics and mortality outcomes in United States adults.

Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver, 2024

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.