When is proning (positioning a patient in a prone position) necessary for a patient with respiratory distress?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

When to Prone a Patient in Respiratory Distress

Prone positioning is strongly recommended in invasively ventilated patients with ARDS and impaired arterial oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2 < 150 mmHg), and should be implemented as soon as indicated for at least 12-16 hours per day. 1

Indications for Prone Positioning in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

  • Severe ARDS: Prone positioning is recommended for patients with severe ARDS with PaO2/FiO2 < 150 mmHg 1, 2
  • Early implementation: Prone positioning should be considered at an early stage (within 48 hours of starting mechanical ventilation) and implemented as soon as indicated 1, 2
  • Duration: Prone positioning should be maintained for at least 12 hours, preferably 16 hours per day 1, 2
  • Complete prone positioning: Complete (180°) rather than incomplete prone positioning is recommended as it has a stronger effect on oxygenation 1
  • Patients with veno-venous ECMO: Prone positioning is suggested in ARDS patients receiving veno-venous ECMO therapy 1

Indications for Awake Proning in Non-Intubated Patients

  • COVID-19 patients: Awake proning is recommended in non-invasively ventilated patients with COVID-19 and acute hypoxic respiratory failure 1, 3
  • Non-COVID respiratory failure: Current guidelines cannot make a definitive recommendation for or against awake proning in non-invasively ventilated patients without COVID-19 1

Physiological Benefits of Prone Positioning

  • Prone positioning improves oxygenation through:
    • More even distribution of gravitational gradient in pleural pressure 2, 4
    • Better distribution of ventilation to dorsal lung areas 2, 4
    • Improved ventilation-perfusion matching 2, 4
    • Reduced alveolar shunt 2
    • More homogeneous distribution of tidal volume, reducing ventilator-induced lung injury 2, 4

Pre-Prone Positioning Considerations

  • Hemodynamic stabilization: Patients should be hemodynamically stabilized and volume status optimized prior to prone positioning 1
  • Ventilation strategy: Apply lung-protective ventilation principles including limitation of tidal volumes, prevention of derecruitment, and integration of spontaneous breathing components 1, 2
  • Pressure ulcer prevention: Careful examination of areas at risk for pressure ulcers is recommended 1

When to Terminate Prone Positioning

  • Sustained improvement: Consider terminating prone positioning if improvement in supine oxygenation persists (PaO2/FiO2 ≥ 150 with PEEP ≤ 10 cm H2O and FiO2 ≤ 0.6) 4 hours after repositioning to supine 1, 2
  • Unsuccessful attempts: Consider discontinuing prone positioning therapy if at least two positioning attempts have been unsuccessful in improving oxygenation 1

Special Considerations and Relative Contraindications

  • Abdominal conditions: Consider prone positioning in patients following abdominal surgery, with abdominal pathologies, or abdominal obesity after individual consideration of benefits versus risks (increased intra-abdominal pressure) 1
  • Increased intracranial pressure: Patients at risk of increased ICP should be monitored continuously during prone positioning, with the head positioned centrally and lateral rotation avoided 1
  • Relative contraindications requiring interdisciplinary risk-benefit assessment:
    • Open abdomen 1
    • Spinal instability 1
    • Increased intracranial pressure 1
    • Cardiac arrhythmias with hemodynamic consequences 1
    • Shock 1

Evidence for Mortality Benefit

  • The PROSEVA trial demonstrated a significant reduction in 28-day mortality from 32.8% in the supine group to 16.0% in the prone group in patients with severe ARDS 5
  • Meta-analyses show prone positioning reduced mortality in trials with prone duration greater than 12 hours per day 6
  • Mortality benefit is most pronounced in patients with severe ARDS (PaO2/FiO2 < 150 mmHg) 2, 6

Potential Complications

  • Prone positioning is associated with risks including:
    • Endotracheal tube obstruction 6
    • Pressure sores 1, 6
    • Potential increases in intra-abdominal pressure 2

Alternative Positioning for Non-Intubated Patients with Mild Respiratory Distress

  • The tripod position may be beneficial for conscious patients with respiratory distress who can maintain the position independently 7
  • This position allows patients to use accessory muscles, particularly the pectoralis muscles, to stabilize the upper chest and shoulder girdle, enabling more efficient diaphragmatic function 7

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Prone Positioning in ARDS Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Does proning on NIV improve oxygenation?

BMJ case reports, 2020

Research

Prone position in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Rationale, indications, and limits.

American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2013

Research

Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.

The New England journal of medicine, 2013

Guideline

Respiratory Mechanics Improvement with the Tripod Position

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.