What is the management approach for fever of unknown origin (FUO)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Fever of Unknown Origin

The management of fever of unknown origin (FUO) requires a systematic diagnostic approach starting with thorough clinical evaluation followed by targeted investigations, with [18F]FDG PET/CT recommended as a valuable second-line imaging modality when initial workup fails to identify the cause. 1, 2

Definition and Classification

  • FUO is defined as fever higher than 38.3°C (100.9°F) persisting for at least 3 weeks, with no diagnosis despite 3 outpatient visits or in-patient days 1, 2
  • FUO is divided into four subcategories: classical, nosocomial, neutropenic, and HIV-related, with etiology varying according to subcategory and geographical location 1
  • Inflammation of unknown origin (IUO), defined as unexplained and prolonged elevation of inflammatory markers without fever, shares similar etiologies 1

Initial Diagnostic Approach

  • Begin with detailed history focusing on travel, animal exposures, occupational risks, and medication use 2, 3
  • Perform thorough physical examination with special attention to skin, lymph nodes, heart, abdomen, and musculoskeletal system 2, 3
  • First-line laboratory testing should include:
    • Complete blood count with differential 1
    • Comprehensive metabolic panel 4, 5
    • Inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate) 1, 2
    • Blood cultures (at least 2-3 sets) 6, 5
    • Urinalysis and urine culture 6
    • Chest radiography 1, 2

Advanced Diagnostic Approach

  • If fever persists after initial evaluation (72-96 hours), proceed with:
    • Advanced imaging including thoracic CT scan 2
    • Abdominal and pelvic CT with contrast 1, 6
    • Consider ultrasound for evaluation of superficial or large fluid collections and collections within or adjacent to solid organs 1
  • [18F]FDG PET/CT is highly recommended when initial workup is non-diagnostic:
    • High sensitivity (84-86%) with diagnostic yield of approximately 56% 1, 2
    • Should ideally be performed within 3 days of initiation of oral glucocorticoid therapy 1
    • Consider myocardial suppression preparation when there is potential cardiac etiology 1

Treatment Approach

  • Empiric therapy may be necessary in critically ill patients while awaiting diagnostic results 1
  • For suspected bacterial infections without identified source, broad-spectrum antibiotics may be initiated 1
  • In cases of suspected tickborne rickettsial diseases, doxycycline should be considered 1
  • For suspected autoimmune conditions like Adult-onset Still's disease, NSAIDs, corticosteroids, or immunosuppressive drugs may be indicated 1
  • Avoid premature closure on a diagnosis before adequate evaluation 2
  • Do not initiate empiric antimicrobial therapy before obtaining appropriate cultures, as this may mask the underlying cause 2

Special Considerations

  • Neutropenic patients require prompt evaluation and empiric antimicrobial therapy 2
  • In children with FUO, appropriate imaging tests include chest radiography, whole body MRI, and FDG-PET/CT 1, 2
  • For febrile infants and young children without signs of respiratory infection, medical management without imaging is usually appropriate 1, 2
  • Be aware that early use of glucocorticoids may suppress inflammatory activity and lead to false negative results on imaging studies 1, 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Premature initiation of empiric therapy before adequate diagnostic workup 2, 7
  • Failure to consider non-infectious causes including malignancies, autoimmune conditions, and drug reactions 6, 7
  • Overlooking the importance of repeated history and physical examinations, which may reveal new diagnostic clues 5, 3
  • Excessive reliance on non-clue-based imaging and specific testing early in the FUO work-up 4
  • Failure to recognize that up to 30% of FUO cases may never have a definitive diagnosis established 3

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Approach to Pyrexia of Unknown Origin (PUO)

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Fever of unknown origin: historical and physical clues to making the diagnosis.

Infectious disease clinics of North America, 2007

Research

Fever of unknown origin: a clinical approach.

The American journal of medicine, 2015

Research

Fever of unknown origin: an evidence-based review.

The American journal of the medical sciences, 2012

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.