What is the best initial pharmacological approach for a patient with a reduced ejection fraction (EF) of 40%?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Best Pharmacological Approach for Ejection Fraction of 40%

For a patient with an ejection fraction of 40%, the best initial pharmacological approach is to start an ACE inhibitor or ARB, along with a beta-blocker, as these medications form the cornerstone of therapy for reduced ejection fraction and have demonstrated mortality benefit. 1

First-Line Medications

ACE Inhibitors/ARBs

  • ACE inhibitors should be started and continued indefinitely in all patients with left ventricular ejection fraction < 40% unless contraindicated 1
  • ARBs are recommended as an alternative in patients who are ACE inhibitor intolerant 1
  • These medications should be initiated as soon as the patient is hemodynamically stable 1

Beta-Blockers

  • Beta-blocker therapy should be used in all patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction ≤40%) with heart failure or prior myocardial infarction 1
  • Use should be limited to evidence-based beta-blockers that have shown mortality benefit: carvedilol, metoprolol succinate, or bisoprolol 1, 2
  • Beta-blockers should be started at low doses and gradually uptitrated as tolerated 2

Second-Line Medications

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists (MRAs)

  • Aldosterone blockade is recommended in patients with ejection fraction < 40% who also have heart failure or diabetes 1
  • Options include spironolactone or eplerenone 2
  • Close monitoring of renal function and potassium levels is essential when using these agents 2, 3

SGLT2 Inhibitors

  • Recent evidence supports the addition of SGLT2 inhibitors to the treatment regimen, as they have demonstrated significant reduction in the composite of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalizations 4
  • SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of heart failure hospitalizations by 26% in patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction 4

Advanced Therapy Options

Sacubitril/Valsartan (ARNI)

  • Consider replacing ACE inhibitor/ARB with sacubitril/valsartan in patients who remain symptomatic despite optimal treatment with an ACE inhibitor/ARB, beta-blocker, and MRA 1, 5
  • Sacubitril/valsartan works by inhibiting neprilysin via LBQ657 (active metabolite of sacubitril) and blocking angiotensin II type-1 receptor via valsartan 5
  • ARNi reduced the risk of heart failure hospitalizations by 40% in patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction 4

Medications to Avoid

  • Non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (verapamil, diltiazem) should be avoided due to their negative inotropic effects and risk of worsening heart failure 2, 3
  • NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors should be avoided as they cause sodium and water retention 3
  • Class I antiarrhythmic agents should be avoided due to potential to worsen heart failure 3

Practical Implementation Strategy

  1. Initial Visit: Start with low doses of both an ACE inhibitor (or ARB) and a beta-blocker simultaneously 6
  2. 1-2 Weeks Later: Consider adding or switching to sacubitril/valsartan if appropriate 6
  3. 2-4 Weeks Later: Add an MRA if the patient has adequate renal function and normal potassium levels 6
  4. Follow-up Visit: Consider adding an SGLT2 inhibitor to the regimen 7, 6

Monitoring Recommendations

  • Monitor renal function and electrolytes closely, particularly when initiating or uptitrating ACE inhibitors/ARBs and MRAs 2, 3
  • Watch for symptomatic hypotension, especially when combining multiple agents that lower blood pressure 2
  • Assess for signs of worsening heart failure during initiation and uptitration of medications 2

Special Considerations

  • An ejection fraction of 40% falls at the borderline between heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) 3
  • Evidence suggests that patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction benefit from similar pharmacological approaches as those with more severely reduced ejection fraction 4, 8
  • Rapid initiation of all four foundational drug classes (ACE inhibitor/ARB/ARNI, beta-blocker, MRA, SGLT2 inhibitor) within 2-4 weeks may provide better outcomes than the traditional sequential approach 6

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.