What are the steps to diagnose multiple myeloma?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: October 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnostic Approach to Multiple Myeloma

The diagnosis of multiple myeloma requires ≥10% clonal plasma cells on bone marrow examination or a biopsy-proven plasmacytoma, plus evidence of end-organ damage (CRAB criteria: hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, anemia, or bone lesions) attributable to the plasma cell disorder. 1, 2

Essential Diagnostic Tests

Laboratory Evaluation

  • Serum protein electrophoresis and immunofixation to detect and characterize monoclonal (M-) protein 3, 1
  • 24-hour urine collection for protein electrophoresis and immunofixation (random samples are insufficient) 3, 1, 4
  • Quantification of immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA, and IgM) by nephelometry 3, 1
  • Serum free light chain (FLC) assay with kappa/lambda ratio, especially important for detecting light chain myeloma 1, 4
  • Complete blood count to assess for anemia 3, 2
  • Serum creatinine and calcium levels to evaluate for renal insufficiency and hypercalcemia 3, 2

Bone Marrow Assessment

  • Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy to quantify plasma cell infiltration (diagnosis requires ≥10% clonal plasma cells) 3, 1
  • CD138 staining to accurately determine plasma cell percentage 1, 2
  • Immunohistochemistry or immunofluorescence to establish clonality of plasma cells 1
  • Cytogenetic/FISH studies for risk stratification, particularly to identify high-risk abnormalities such as del(13), t(4;14), and del(17p) 3, 1

Imaging Studies

  • Full skeletal survey (X-rays) including spine, pelvis, skull, humeri, and femurs to detect lytic bone lesions 3, 1
  • MRI of spine and pelvis if there are symptoms suggesting bone lesions even with negative X-rays, or if spinal cord compression is suspected 3, 1
  • CT scan may be needed to evaluate symptomatic bony sites 3, 1
  • PET scan may help distinguish between MGUS, smoldering myeloma, and overt myeloma 3, 1

Diagnostic Criteria and Differential Diagnosis

CRAB Criteria for End-Organ Damage

  • C: Hypercalcemia (serum calcium >11.5 mg/dL) 2
  • R: Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine >2 mg/dL or creatinine clearance <40 mL/min) 2
  • A: Anemia (hemoglobin <10 g/dL or 2 g/dL below lower limit of normal) 2
  • B: Bone lesions (lytic lesions, severe osteopenia, or pathologic fractures) 2

Differential Diagnosis Between Plasma Cell Disorders

  • Multiple Myeloma: ≥10% clonal plasma cells in bone marrow or biopsy-proven plasmacytoma, plus CRAB criteria 3, 2
  • Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (SMM): Serum monoclonal protein (IgG or IgA) ≥3 g/dL and/or clonal bone marrow plasma cells ≥10%, but absence of CRAB criteria 3, 2
  • Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS): Serum monoclonal protein <3 g/dL, clonal bone marrow plasma cells <10%, and absence of CRAB criteria 3, 2

Risk Stratification

  • The Revised International Staging System combines serum biomarkers (β2-microglobulin, albumin, and lactate dehydrogenase) with cytogenetic abnormalities to assess prognosis 5
  • Cytogenetic abnormalities such as del(13), t(4;14), and del(17p) are associated with poorer outcomes 3
  • Progression rates differ significantly: MGUS progresses at 1% per year, while SMM progresses at 10% per year for the first 5 years 3, 2

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Bone marrow examination is not routinely recommended for IgG MGUS if serum M-protein ≤15 g/L without end-organ damage 2
  • Bone marrow examination is recommended for all IgA and IgM M-proteins 2
  • Serum FLC measurements can be affected by renal function, potentially leading to false elevations 4
  • The same test should be used for serial measurements to ensure accurate relative quantification 4
  • Unnecessary bone marrow biopsies and imaging in low-risk MGUS patients should be avoided 2
  • Serum FLC assay cannot completely replace 24-hour urine protein electrophoresis for monitoring patients with measurable urinary M-protein 4

By following this systematic diagnostic approach, clinicians can accurately diagnose multiple myeloma and differentiate it from related plasma cell disorders, allowing for appropriate treatment decisions and improved patient outcomes.

References

Guideline

Diagnostic Workup for Multiple Myeloma

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Workup and Treatment Approach for Multiple Myeloma vs MGUS

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic and Treatment Approach for Multiple Myeloma with Negative Serum Paraprotein

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.