What is the treatment for Steven Johnson syndrome, including the use of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 4, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome with IVIG

IVIG should be considered as a treatment option for severe Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), particularly in steroid-unresponsive cases, with high-dose regimens (total 2-3 g/kg over 3-5 days) showing better outcomes than low-dose protocols. 1

Primary Treatment Approach

Immediate Management

  • Discontinue the culprit drug immediately and admit to a burn unit or ICU with dermatology consultation 2
  • Provide meticulous supportive care including fluid/electrolyte balance, wound care, and infection prevention 2
  • Apply topical emollients (petrolatum-based), high-strength topical corticosteroids, and oral antihistamines 2

Systemic Immunomodulation

For Grade 3-4 SJS/TEN:

  • First-line: IV methylprednisolone 0.5-1 mg/kg for Grade 3, or 1-2 mg/kg for Grade 4, tapering when toxicity resolves 2
  • IVIG or cyclosporine may be added in severe or steroid-unresponsive cases 2

IVIG Dosing Protocols

High-Dose Regimen (Preferred)

  • Total dose: 2-3 g/kg administered over 3-5 consecutive days 1
  • Most successful protocols use 1 g/kg/day for 3 days 1
  • Meta-regression analysis demonstrates a strong inverse correlation between IVIG dosage and mortality (slope: -0.59, P = 0.009), with doses ≥2 g/kg significantly decreasing mortality 3

Low-Dose Regimen (Less Favorable)

  • Doses of 0.4 g/kg for 4 days showed mortality rates of 42%, indicating inferior outcomes 1

Evidence Quality and Limitations

Mixed Evidence Base

The evidence for IVIG remains controversial:

  • No overall survival benefit was demonstrated in meta-analysis comparing IVIG to supportive care alone (OR 1.00,95% CI 0.58-1.75) 1
  • However, high-dose IVIG (2-3 g/kg) has been associated with improved survival compared to low-dose regimens in adults 1
  • A propensity-matched study showed IVIG combined with corticosteroids reduced time to arrest progression by 1.56 days (P = 0.000) and hospital stay by 3.37 days (P = 0.000) 4

Pediatric Considerations

  • Pediatric patients treated with IVIG have significantly lower mortality than adults (0% vs. 21.6%) 1
  • In a pediatric case series, fever duration was shortened from 14 days to 8 days with IVIG (P = 0.06), though statistical significance was marginal 5

Clinical Decision Algorithm

When to Use IVIG:

  1. Severe disease (Grade 4) with >10% BSA involvement and systemic symptoms 2
  2. Steroid-unresponsive cases after initial corticosteroid therapy 2
  3. Rapidly progressive disease despite supportive care 1
  4. Pediatric patients, given their superior outcomes with IVIG 1

When to Consider Alternatives:

  • If IVIG unavailable or contraindicated, cyclosporine 3 mg/kg daily for 10 days (then tapered) is an alternative, showing effectiveness with no deaths despite SCORTEN-predicted mortality 6

Safety Monitoring During IVIG

Monitor for complications:

  • Thromboembolic events 1
  • Renal dysfunction 1
  • Aseptic meningitis 1

IVIG may be safer than systemic corticosteroids alone, which carry increased infection risk 1, 6

Important Caveats

Context-Specific Recommendations

  • For immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced SJS/TEN, the usual prohibition of corticosteroids does not apply, as the mechanism is T-cell immune-directed toxicity requiring adequate immunosuppression 2
  • UK guidelines note insufficient evidence to recommend IVIG routinely, suggesting it should only be administered under specialist supervision in the context of clinical research or case registry 2

Combination Therapy

  • IVIG combined with corticosteroids showed 45% lower mortality compared to corticosteroids alone (though not statistically significant, P = 0.555) and significantly lower skin infection rates (P < 0.025) 4
  • The total infection rate decreased by 67% with combination therapy (P = 0.047) 4

Multidisciplinary Consultations Required

Essential consultations for mucosal involvement:

  • Ophthalmology (for ocular involvement) 2
  • Otolaryngology (for oral/pharyngeal involvement) 2
  • Urology/Gynecology (for genital involvement) 2
  • Wound care services 2

High-quality supportive care remains the priority regardless of specific immunomodulatory interventions chosen 1, 6

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.