What is the role of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in the treatment of Stevens-Johnson syndrome?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 6, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

IVIG for Stevens-Johnson Syndrome

IVIG is not recommended as standard therapy for Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) based on the highest quality evidence showing no mortality benefit compared to supportive care alone. 1

Evidence Quality and Recommendations

The 2016 UK guidelines for management of SJS/TEN provide the most definitive guidance on this question. A meta-analysis of controlled studies found no survival benefit with IVIG, with a pooled odds ratio for mortality of 1.00 (95% CI 0.58-1.75; P = 0.99) when comparing IVIG to supportive care. 1 This represents level 3-4 evidence, which is insufficient to support routine use. 2

Key Findings from Guidelines

  • The overall mortality rate in 221 patients with TEN and SJS-TEN overlap treated with IVIG was 19.9%, showing no statistical improvement over supportive care. 1

  • High-quality supportive care remains the priority in SJS/TEN management regardless of specific interventions. 2

  • There is no active therapeutic regimen with unequivocal benefit for SJS/TEN. 2

Dosing Considerations If IVIG Is Used

Despite lack of proven efficacy, if IVIG is considered in severe or refractory cases, dosing matters significantly:

  • High-dose IVIG (total 2-3 g/kg over 3-5 days) shows better outcomes than low-dose regimens in adults. 2 Meta-regression demonstrated a strong inverse correlation between IVIG dosage and mortality (slope: -0.59,95% CI -0.14 to -1.03; P = 0.009). 3

  • Low-dose protocols (0.4 g/kg for 4 days) showed unfavorable outcomes with 42% mortality. 2

  • The standard protocol when used is 1 g/kg/day for 3 consecutive days (total 3 g/kg). 2

Population-Specific Considerations

Pediatric patients treated with IVIG had significantly lower mortality than adults (0% vs. 21.6%, P = 0.01). 1 However, this finding requires cautious interpretation as it comes from observational data with potential selection bias.

Important Caveat for Mycoplasma-Associated SJS

In Mycoplasma pneumoniae-associated SJS specifically, IVIG alone was associated with longer hospital stays and more febrile days compared to supportive care. 4 When systemic corticosteroids were used alone or with IVIG, outcomes trended better than IVIG monotherapy. 4 This suggests IVIG should not be used as monotherapy in this subset.

Ocular Outcomes

When given in the acute phase of SJS/TEN, there is no robust evidence for benefit of IVIG to improve ocular outcomes. 1 A retrospective study comparing 8 patients receiving IVIG to 8 historical controls found no difference in severity of visually significant ocular complications. 1

Safety Profile

IVIG may be safer than systemic corticosteroids, which carry concerns about increased infection risk. 2 However, adverse effects include headache, aseptic meningitis, thromboembolic events, renal dysfunction, and anaphylaxis (particularly in IgA-deficient patients). 1, 2

Clinical Algorithm

Given the evidence:

  1. Prioritize high-quality supportive care as the foundation of treatment 2
  2. Do not use IVIG as routine first-line therapy 1
  3. Consider high-dose IVIG (2-3 g/kg total) only in severe, life-threatening cases where benefits may outweigh costs and lack of proven efficacy 2, 3
  4. In Mycoplasma-associated SJS, avoid IVIG monotherapy; if immunomodulation is needed, consider corticosteroids instead 4
  5. In pediatric cases, IVIG may have a more favorable risk-benefit profile than in adults 1

The bottom line: supportive care remains the evidence-based standard, and IVIG should be reserved for exceptional circumstances with informed discussion about limited evidence of benefit. 1, 2

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.