What is the recommended dose of apixaban (Eliquis) or edoxaban (Savaysa) for a patient with impaired renal function undergoing haemodialysis (hemodialysis)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Apixaban or Edoxaban in Haemodialysis Patients

For haemodialysis patients requiring anticoagulation, apixaban 5 mg twice daily is the recommended dose, with dose reduction to 2.5 mg twice daily only if the patient is ≥80 years old OR weighs ≤60 kg (not both required). Edoxaban is contraindicated in patients on dialysis and should not be used. 1

Apixaban Dosing in Haemodialysis

Standard Dosing Approach

The FDA-approved dose for haemodialysis patients is apixaban 5 mg twice daily, which produces drug exposure similar to that seen in the ARISTOTLE trial. 2 The American College of Cardiology and AHA/ACC/HRS guidelines support this dosing strategy. 3

  • Dose reduction to 2.5 mg twice daily is indicated if the patient meets at least one of these criteria: 3

    • Age ≥80 years
    • Body weight ≤60 kg
  • This differs from the atrial fibrillation dosing criteria in patients with normal renal function, where two of three criteria (age ≥80, weight ≤60 kg, or creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL) are required for dose reduction. 2

Pharmacokinetic Evidence

The dosing recommendations are based on critical pharmacokinetic data showing that drug accumulation occurs in dialysis patients:

  • Apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily in dialysis patients produces steady-state drug exposure comparable to 5 mg twice daily in patients with preserved renal function. 1, 4

  • However, apixaban 5 mg twice daily in dialysis patients leads to supratherapeutic levels (area under the curve of 6045 ng h/ml) that exceed the 90th percentile for patients with normal renal function. 4

  • Despite this accumulation, observational data from 25,523 patients in the US Renal Data System showed that standard-dose apixaban (5 mg twice daily) was associated with lower risk of stroke/embolism and death compared to reduced-dose apixaban (2.5 mg twice daily) and warfarin. 1

Clinical Trial Data

  • The RENAL-AF trial (2022) randomized 154 haemodialysis patients to apixaban versus warfarin but stopped prematurely due to enrollment challenges. 5 The trial was underpowered but showed:
    • No significant difference in major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding between apixaban and warfarin (32% vs 26% at 1 year, HR 1.20,95% CI 0.63-2.30) 5
    • Similar stroke rates (3.0% vs 3.3%) 5
    • Bleeding events were approximately 10-fold more frequent than stroke in this population, highlighting the high bleeding risk regardless of anticoagulant choice. 5

Dialysis Impact on Drug Clearance

  • Dialysis removes only 4% of apixaban, so timing of doses relative to dialysis sessions is not critical. 4
  • Apixaban has the lowest renal clearance (27%) among NOACs, making it theoretically preferable in severe renal impairment. 3, 2

Edoxaban in Haemodialysis

Edoxaban is absolutely contraindicated in patients with end-stage renal disease or on dialysis and should never be used. 1

  • Edoxaban is 50% renally excreted, leading to excessive drug accumulation in dialysis patients. 1
  • The ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial excluded patients with creatinine clearance <30 mL/min. 1
  • No dosing recommendations exist for edoxaban in dialysis patients, and its use is explicitly not recommended by guidelines. 1

Critical Considerations and Pitfalls

Common Dosing Errors to Avoid

  • Do not automatically use 2.5 mg twice daily in all dialysis patients—this is a common error. The majority of dialysis patients should receive 5 mg twice daily unless they meet specific age or weight criteria. 3

  • Do not apply the atrial fibrillation dose-reduction criteria (requiring 2 of 3 factors) to dialysis patients. In dialysis, only one factor (age ≥80 OR weight ≤60 kg) is needed for dose reduction. 3

  • Do not use edoxaban, dabigatran, or rivaroxaban in dialysis patients. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban have been associated with higher bleeding risk than warfarin in dialysis populations. 1

Bleeding Risk Management

  • Major bleeding rates in dialysis patients on apixaban range from 7-14% in observational studies, substantially higher than in patients with preserved renal function. 6

  • Monitor for bleeding complications closely, particularly gastrointestinal bleeding, which is common in this population. 7

  • Drug interactions with dual P-glycoprotein and strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers may require dose adjustment or avoidance. 3, 2

Alternative: Warfarin

If apixaban is not tolerated or contraindicated:

  • Warfarin remains an alternative, though it carries increased bleeding risk and did not reduce deaths, ischemic events, or strokes in recent meta-analyses of dialysis patients. 1

  • Warfarin may rarely cause calciphylaxis in ESRD patients, a painful and often lethal condition. 3

  • Target INR 2.0-3.0, though time in therapeutic range is typically poor (44% in RENAL-AF). 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Apixaban Use in End-Stage Renal Failure

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Apixaban Pharmacokinetics at Steady State in Hemodialysis Patients.

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, 2017

Guideline

Apixaban Management in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease on Hemodialysis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.