What is the role of anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (anti-VEGF) agents, such as Lucentis (ranibizumab) or Eylea (aflibercept), in improving or preserving visual acuity?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Anti-VEGF Therapy Dramatically Improves and Preserves Visual Acuity

Anti-VEGF agents (ranibizumab, aflibercept, bevacizumab) consistently improve visual acuity by 6-12 letters in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema, with 90-95% of patients avoiding significant vision loss. 1, 2

Magnitude of Visual Acuity Benefit

The visual benefit of anti-VEGF therapy is substantial and clinically meaningful:

  • Patients gain an average of 6-12 letters (1-2 lines) on the ETDRS chart, improving from baseline Snellen equivalents of 20/50-20/80 to 20/32-20/50 2
  • 94-95% of treated patients lose fewer than 15 letters (3 lines) compared to only 62% of untreated patients 1
  • 25-34% of patients gain 15 or more letters (3+ lines) versus only 5% with sham treatment 1
  • The improvement occurs rapidly, with 60-90% of total visual gain achieved within the first 3 months of treatment 2

Disease-Specific Outcomes

Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

For nAMD, ranibizumab demonstrated mean visual acuity improvements of 6.5-7.2 letters at 12 months, maintained through 24 months, compared to a 10.4-letter decline in untreated eyes 1. When comparing agents head-to-head using treat-and-extend regimens, ranibizumab showed 7.2-letter improvement versus 4.9 letters with aflibercept at 12 months, though this difference did not reach statistical significance 3.

Diabetic Macular Edema

In DME, the benefit varies by baseline visual acuity 4:

  • For worse baseline vision (20/50 to 20/320): Aflibercept produced 18.1-letter improvement, ranibizumab 16.1 letters, and bevacizumab 13.3 letters at 2 years, with aflibercept statistically superior to bevacizumab 4
  • For better baseline vision (20/32 to 20/40): All three agents performed similarly with 7-9 letter improvements 4

Beyond Standard Visual Acuity

Anti-VEGF therapy improves multiple dimensions of visual function beyond distance acuity 5:

  • Reading acuity and reading speed improve significantly 5
  • Contrast sensitivity under both mesopic and photopic conditions enhances 5
  • Glare disability decreases 5
  • Retinotopic ocular sensitivity improves at all eccentricities 5

These functional improvements occur even when standard distance visual acuity shows no change, highlighting that ETDRS letter scores underestimate the full visual benefit 5.

Treatment Regimen Considerations

A treat-and-extend regimen appears optimal for balancing efficacy and treatment burden 2:

  • Fixed monthly regimens risk overtreatment and potential macular atrophy 2
  • Pro re nata (as-needed) regimens risk undertreatment and failure to achieve maximal visual potential 2
  • Treat-and-extend maintains visual gains while minimizing injection frequency 2, 3

The mean injection frequency at 2 years ranges from 15-16 total injections across all anti-VEGF agents when using protocol-driven regimens 4.

Safety Profile

Serious ocular adverse events remain uncommon 1:

  • Endophthalmitis occurs in approximately 1.0% of treated patients 1
  • Serious uveitis affects 1.3% of patients 1
  • Systemic APTC events occurred in 5-12% across agents over 2 years, with ranibizumab showing higher rates (12%) compared to aflibercept (5%), though this requires continued evaluation 4

Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid

The upper limit of visual improvement is determined by the eye's inherent capacity, not by the choice of anti-VEGF agent or treatment regimen 2. Clinicians should not expect unlimited visual gains regardless of treatment intensity. Additionally, while aflibercept may cause more choroidal thinning than ranibizumab—a risk factor for macular atrophy—the long-term clinical significance requires further study 2.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.