Continuation of Exondys 51 is NOT Medically Necessary for This Patient
Continuation of eteplirsen (Exondys 51) should NOT be approved for this 18-year-old non-ambulatory patient with DMD, as he fails to meet the critical continuation criteria of remaining ambulatory—the primary evidence-based endpoint for demonstrating treatment response. 1
Critical Analysis of Continuation Criteria
Patient Does NOT Meet Continuation Requirements
The patient explicitly fails the essential continuation criterion established by evidence-based guidelines:
- Ambulatory Status Requirement: The patient lost ambulation at age 12 and is now wheelchair-dependent (both PWC and MWC use), requiring maximum assistance with transfers 1
- Continuation Criteria: Guidelines specify that continuation requires "remaining ambulatory (e.g., able to walk with or without assistance, not wheelchair dependent)" 1
- Duration of Non-Ambulatory Status: The patient has been non-ambulatory for 6 years (since age 12), well beyond any reasonable expectation of treatment benefit 1
Patient Also Failed Initial Approval Criteria
Beyond continuation criteria, this patient would not have qualified for initial approval under current evidence-based standards:
- Age at Initiation: Treatment should be "initiated before the age of 14," but continuation is being requested at age 18 for a patient who lost ambulation at 12 1
- Baseline Functional Capacity: Initial approval requires "an average distance of at least 180 meters while walking independently over 6 minutes"—this patient cannot walk at all 1
Evidence Base for Ambulatory-Only Benefit
Clinical Trial Data Support Ambulatory Patients Only
The evidence supporting eteplirsen demonstrates benefit exclusively in ambulatory populations:
- Primary Endpoint: Clinical trials measured 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance as the key functional outcome, requiring patients to walk 200-400 meters at baseline 2
- Treatment Effect: Eteplirsen-treated patients showed a 67.3-meter benefit on 6MWT compared to placebo, but this outcome is only measurable in ambulatory patients 2
- PROMOVI Trial: The phase 3 study confirmed attenuation of decline on 6MWT (-68.9 m vs -133.8 m in controls), again requiring ambulatory function 3
No Evidence for Non-Ambulatory Benefit
- Lack of Data: No clinical trials have demonstrated dystrophin production translates to functional benefit in non-ambulatory DMD patients receiving eteplirsen 2, 3
- Cardiac Limitations: Unmodified PMOs (like eteplirsen) have "limited efficacy in the heart," which becomes the primary concern in non-ambulatory patients 4
Appropriate Management for Non-Ambulatory DMD Patients
Glucocorticoid Therapy Remains Indicated
Glucocorticoids should be continued even after loss of ambulation, as they provide benefits distinct from exon-skipping therapy:
- Scoliosis Prevention: Glucocorticoids reduce "progressive scoliosis and need for spinal surgery" in non-ambulatory patients 1
- Pulmonary Function: They "stabilize pulmonary function and delay need for noninvasive ventilation" 1
- Cardiac Protection: Continued steroid use may help delay cardiac complications 5, 1
- Dosing: Continue prednisone 0.75 mg/kg/day or deflazacort 0.9 mg/kg/day (maximum 30 mg/day or 36 mg/day respectively at 40 kg body weight) 5, 1
Multidisciplinary Non-Ambulatory Care
For this 18-year-old non-ambulatory patient, focus should shift to:
- Cardiac Management: ACE inhibitors or ARBs should be established by age 10, with β-blockers added as needed for ventricular dysfunction 1
- Respiratory Support: Regular pulmonary function monitoring, sleep studies for hypoventilation, and consideration of noninvasive ventilation 1
- Scoliosis Management: Given the patient's documented scoliosis requiring updated seating mold, surgical evaluation may be warranted if Cobb angle reaches 30-50 degrees 1
- Physical/Occupational Therapy: Continue PT/OT to maintain range of motion, prevent contractures, and optimize wheelchair positioning 5, 1
- Bone Health: Monitor for fractures (patient has history of multiple healed LE fractures), ensure adequate vitamin D and calcium, consider bisphosphonates 5
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Continuing Ineffective Therapy: Maintaining eteplirsen in non-ambulatory patients wastes resources without evidence of benefit and may give false hope to families 2, 3
- Neglecting Proven Therapies: Discontinuing glucocorticoids prematurely in non-ambulatory patients deprives them of proven benefits for scoliosis, pulmonary function, and potentially cardiac outcomes 1
- Missing Cardiac Surveillance: At age 18, cardiac management becomes paramount—ensure ACE inhibitor/ARB and β-blocker therapy is optimized 1
- Inadequate Respiratory Monitoring: Non-ambulatory patients require vigilant pulmonary function testing and sleep studies to time noninvasive ventilation appropriately 1