Is continuation of Exondys 51 (eteplirsen) treatment medically necessary for an 18-year-old male with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) due to deletion of exon 50, who lost ambulation at age 12 and uses a power wheelchair (PWC) and manual wheelchair (MWC)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 12, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Continuation of Exondys 51 is NOT Medically Necessary for This Patient

Continuation of eteplirsen (Exondys 51) should NOT be approved for this 18-year-old non-ambulatory patient with DMD, as he fails to meet the critical continuation criteria of remaining ambulatory—the primary evidence-based endpoint for demonstrating treatment response. 1

Critical Analysis of Continuation Criteria

Patient Does NOT Meet Continuation Requirements

The patient explicitly fails the essential continuation criterion established by evidence-based guidelines:

  • Ambulatory Status Requirement: The patient lost ambulation at age 12 and is now wheelchair-dependent (both PWC and MWC use), requiring maximum assistance with transfers 1
  • Continuation Criteria: Guidelines specify that continuation requires "remaining ambulatory (e.g., able to walk with or without assistance, not wheelchair dependent)" 1
  • Duration of Non-Ambulatory Status: The patient has been non-ambulatory for 6 years (since age 12), well beyond any reasonable expectation of treatment benefit 1

Patient Also Failed Initial Approval Criteria

Beyond continuation criteria, this patient would not have qualified for initial approval under current evidence-based standards:

  • Age at Initiation: Treatment should be "initiated before the age of 14," but continuation is being requested at age 18 for a patient who lost ambulation at 12 1
  • Baseline Functional Capacity: Initial approval requires "an average distance of at least 180 meters while walking independently over 6 minutes"—this patient cannot walk at all 1

Evidence Base for Ambulatory-Only Benefit

Clinical Trial Data Support Ambulatory Patients Only

The evidence supporting eteplirsen demonstrates benefit exclusively in ambulatory populations:

  • Primary Endpoint: Clinical trials measured 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance as the key functional outcome, requiring patients to walk 200-400 meters at baseline 2
  • Treatment Effect: Eteplirsen-treated patients showed a 67.3-meter benefit on 6MWT compared to placebo, but this outcome is only measurable in ambulatory patients 2
  • PROMOVI Trial: The phase 3 study confirmed attenuation of decline on 6MWT (-68.9 m vs -133.8 m in controls), again requiring ambulatory function 3

No Evidence for Non-Ambulatory Benefit

  • Lack of Data: No clinical trials have demonstrated dystrophin production translates to functional benefit in non-ambulatory DMD patients receiving eteplirsen 2, 3
  • Cardiac Limitations: Unmodified PMOs (like eteplirsen) have "limited efficacy in the heart," which becomes the primary concern in non-ambulatory patients 4

Appropriate Management for Non-Ambulatory DMD Patients

Glucocorticoid Therapy Remains Indicated

Glucocorticoids should be continued even after loss of ambulation, as they provide benefits distinct from exon-skipping therapy:

  • Scoliosis Prevention: Glucocorticoids reduce "progressive scoliosis and need for spinal surgery" in non-ambulatory patients 1
  • Pulmonary Function: They "stabilize pulmonary function and delay need for noninvasive ventilation" 1
  • Cardiac Protection: Continued steroid use may help delay cardiac complications 5, 1
  • Dosing: Continue prednisone 0.75 mg/kg/day or deflazacort 0.9 mg/kg/day (maximum 30 mg/day or 36 mg/day respectively at 40 kg body weight) 5, 1

Multidisciplinary Non-Ambulatory Care

For this 18-year-old non-ambulatory patient, focus should shift to:

  • Cardiac Management: ACE inhibitors or ARBs should be established by age 10, with β-blockers added as needed for ventricular dysfunction 1
  • Respiratory Support: Regular pulmonary function monitoring, sleep studies for hypoventilation, and consideration of noninvasive ventilation 1
  • Scoliosis Management: Given the patient's documented scoliosis requiring updated seating mold, surgical evaluation may be warranted if Cobb angle reaches 30-50 degrees 1
  • Physical/Occupational Therapy: Continue PT/OT to maintain range of motion, prevent contractures, and optimize wheelchair positioning 5, 1
  • Bone Health: Monitor for fractures (patient has history of multiple healed LE fractures), ensure adequate vitamin D and calcium, consider bisphosphonates 5

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Continuing Ineffective Therapy: Maintaining eteplirsen in non-ambulatory patients wastes resources without evidence of benefit and may give false hope to families 2, 3
  • Neglecting Proven Therapies: Discontinuing glucocorticoids prematurely in non-ambulatory patients deprives them of proven benefits for scoliosis, pulmonary function, and potentially cardiac outcomes 1
  • Missing Cardiac Surveillance: At age 18, cardiac management becomes paramount—ensure ACE inhibitor/ARB and β-blocker therapy is optimized 1
  • Inadequate Respiratory Monitoring: Non-ambulatory patients require vigilant pulmonary function testing and sleep studies to time noninvasive ventilation appropriately 1

References

Guideline

Treatment for Muscular Dystrophy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.