What is the approach for working up a patient with fatty liver disease?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Workup Approach for Fatty Liver Disease

Step 1: Identify At-Risk Patients Requiring Evaluation

Screen patients with type 2 diabetes, those with 2 or more metabolic risk factors (central obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL, hypertension, prediabetes), or those with incidental hepatic steatosis on imaging—especially if aminotransferases are elevated. 1

  • Patients with only 1 or no metabolic trait have low risk of progression to cirrhosis or HCC, but risk increases stepwise with each additional metabolic condition 1
  • Incidentally discovered hepatic steatosis warrants evaluation, particularly when accompanied by elevated ALT, as these patients have significantly higher risk of progression to cirrhosis or HCC 1

Step 2: Initial History and Laboratory Assessment

Alcohol and Substance Use History

  • Document detailed alcohol intake using AUDIT-C questionnaire to identify unsuspected alcohol-related liver disease and binge drinking patterns 1
  • Half of heavy drinkers with normal BMI and over 90% of obese heavy drinkers have hepatic steatosis; even non-heavy drinkers who binge drink have increased steatosis risk 1
  • Complete smoking and illicit drug history is mandatory 1

Medication Review

  • Identify drugs that cause steatosis: amiodarone, carbamazepine, sodium valproate, NSAIDs, glucocorticoids, 5-Fluorouracil, methotrexate, tamoxifen, and antiretrovirals (efavirenz) 1
  • Approximately 2% of NAFLD cases are attributable to prescribed medications 1

Initial Laboratory Tests

  • Order comprehensive metabolic panel (includes liver enzymes, albumin), complete blood count (for platelet count), and lipid panel 1
  • These baseline labs allow calculation of simple fibrosis scores (FIB-4, NAFLD Fibrosis Score) 1

Exclude Other Liver Diseases

  • Test for hepatitis C antibody with reflex HCV RNA, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and consider ANA, AMA, anti-smooth muscle antibodies, immunoglobulins, ferritin, and alpha-1 antitrypsin 1
  • This blood aetiology screen should be completed if not already done in primary care 1

Step 3: Risk Stratify Using Non-Invasive Fibrosis Testing

Calculate FIB-4 Score First

  • FIB-4 < 1.3 = LOW RISK; FIB-4 1.3-2.67 = INDETERMINATE RISK; FIB-4 > 2.67 = HIGH RISK 1, 2
  • For patients age 65+, use FIB-4 < 1.0 as the lower cutoff (upper cutoff remains 2.67) 1
  • In patients with high pretest probability (the at-risk groups identified in Step 1), move directly to risk stratification without requiring ultrasound to diagnose steatosis 1

Confirm with Liver Stiffness Measurement (LSM)

  • Perform vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE/FibroScan): LSM < 8 kPa = LOW RISK; LSM 8-12 kPa = INDETERMINATE RISK; LSM > 12 kPa = HIGH RISK 1, 2
  • If VCTE unavailable, ultrasound is acceptable or consider referral to hepatologist for patients with indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4 1
  • Other elastography techniques (bidimensional shear wave elastography, point shear wave elastography) can substitute for VCTE 1

Step 4: Management Based on Risk Stratification

LOW RISK (FIB-4 < 1.3 or LSM < 8 kPa)

  • Manage in primary care with focus on lifestyle modification and cardiovascular risk reduction 1
  • Target 5-10% weight loss through hypocaloric diet (500-1000 kcal deficit daily) and 150-300 minutes of moderate-intensity exercise weekly 3, 2
  • Prescribe statins for dyslipidemia—they are safe in fatty liver disease and reduce HCC risk by 37% 2
  • Reassess fibrosis using non-invasive tests after 3 years (extend to 5 years if metabolic factors well-controlled and weight loss goals achieved) 1, 3

INDETERMINATE RISK (FIB-4 1.3-2.67 or LSM 8-12 kPa)

  • Refer to hepatology for consideration of liver biopsy to confirm NASH and stage fibrosis 3, 2
  • Intensive lifestyle intervention targeting 7-10% weight loss is required 3
  • For diabetes, prioritize GLP-1 receptor agonists (semaglutide, liraglutide) or pioglitazone—medications with proven liver histological benefit 1, 3
  • For non-diabetic patients, consider vitamin E (800 IU daily), GLP-1 receptor agonists, or pioglitazone through shared decision-making 3
  • Repeat non-invasive fibrosis testing every 1-3 years 3

HIGH RISK (FIB-4 > 2.67 or LSM > 12 kPa)

  • Mandatory hepatology referral for multidisciplinary management 1, 3
  • F2 fibrosis (clinically significant fibrosis) represents a critical intervention threshold—this is NOT "early" disease and requires intensive intervention comparable to higher-risk patients 3
  • Strong need for structured weight loss programs, anti-obesity medications, or bariatric surgery 1, 3
  • Complete alcohol abstinence is mandatory—there is no safe threshold for alcohol intake at this stage 3
  • Prefer diabetes medications with NASH efficacy: GLP-1 receptor agonists first-line, pioglitazone second-line 1, 3

CIRRHOSIS (LSM > 20 kPa or clinical/imaging evidence of F4)

  • Initiate HCC surveillance with ultrasound every 6 months 1, 2
  • Screen for gastroesophageal varices if LSM > 20 kPa or platelet count < 150,000/mm³ 1, 2
  • Pharmacotherapy for NASH cirrhosis is very limited and should be avoided until more data become available 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume normal ALT means no disease progression—14-24% of patients with persistently normal ALT have more-than-portal fibrosis and may progress despite normal enzymes 4
  • Do not neglect cardiovascular risk assessment—cardiovascular disease is the main driver of mortality in NAFLD patients before cirrhosis develops 2
  • Do not fail to address all components of metabolic syndrome simultaneously—combination therapy addressing lifestyle, metabolic factors, and liver-directed pharmacotherapy yields superior outcomes compared to single interventions 3
  • Ultrasound has suboptimal sensitivity for mild steatosis, so in high-risk patients, proceed directly to fibrosis risk stratification rather than waiting for imaging confirmation 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Moderate to Severe Fatty Liver Disease

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Stage F2 Liver Fibrosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Mild Liver Fibrosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.