Is Betadine (povidone-iodine) soaked gauze an effective treatment for packing a deep sacral pressure ulcer to promote healing?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Stop Using Betadine-Soaked Gauze for Deep Sacral Pressure Ulcers

You should discontinue packing this deep sacral pressure ulcer with Betadine-soaked gauze and switch to hydrocolloid or foam dressings, which have superior evidence for promoting healing. Betadine (povidone-iodine) is not recommended as a primary treatment strategy for pressure ulcer healing, and plain gauze dressings are inferior to modern moisture-retentive dressings 1.

Why Betadine-Soaked Gauze Is Not Recommended

Evidence Against Antiseptics for Healing

  • Antiseptics like povidone-iodine have not been shown to improve pressure ulcer healing and may actually result in fewer ulcers healing compared to non-antimicrobial alternatives 2.

  • A Cochrane systematic review found that povidone-iodine was associated with lower healing rates compared to protease-modulating dressings (RR 0.78,95% CI 0.62 to 0.98) and hydrogel (RR 0.64,95% CI 0.43 to 0.97) 2.

  • The evidence quality for antiseptics ranges from moderate to very low, with no clear benefit demonstrated for wound healing 2.

Gauze Dressings Are Inferior

  • Hydrocolloid dressings are superior to gauze dressings for reducing wound size (low-quality evidence) 1, 3.

  • The American College of Physicians guidelines specifically recommend hydrocolloid or foam dressings over gauze 1.

What You Should Do Instead

Primary Wound Care Strategy

  • Apply hydrocolloid or foam dressings as the primary dressing after appropriate wound cleansing and debridement 1, 4.

  • Hydrocolloid and foam dressings are equivalent in effectiveness (moderate-quality evidence), so choose based on the exudate level: foam dressings are more absorbent for moderate to high exudate 5.

Essential Concurrent Interventions

  • Ensure surgical debridement of necrotic tissue if present, as this is necessary for infected pressure ulcers 1.

  • Provide protein supplementation at 1.2-1.5 g/kg/day to support wound healing—this is a formal recommendation from the American College of Physicians (weak recommendation, low-quality evidence) 1, 4.

  • Implement pressure redistribution with air-loss mattress or dynamic support surfaces and repositioning every 2-4 hours 4.

Special Considerations for Sacral Location

  • Manage fecal and urinary incontinence aggressively, as moisture increases maceration risk and can contaminate dressings in the sacral area 6.

  • Sacral pressure ulcers have lower recurrence rates after surgery compared to ischial ulcers if the wound progresses to requiring surgical intervention 1, 3.

When Antimicrobials Might Be Appropriate

Systemic Antibiotics Only for Infection

  • Reserve antibiotic therapy for patients with severe pressure ulcer infections, including those with spreading cellulitis or systemic signs of infection 1.

  • Because pressure ulcer infections are typically polymicrobial (S. aureus, Enterococcus, Proteus, E. coli, Pseudomonas, and anaerobes including Bacteroides and Clostridium), therapeutic regimens should cover Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and anaerobic organisms 1.

  • Do not obtain wound cultures unless infection is clinically suspected 4.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not use dextranomer paste—it is inferior to other wound dressings for reducing ulcer area 1, 3.

  • Avoid detergent-containing povidone-iodine preparations (skin cleansers/surgical scrubs) as the detergent component can cause tissue damage and delay healing; if used, immediately rinse with saline 7.

  • Do not rely on antiseptics as a healing strategy—the evidence shows they do not improve outcomes and may worsen them 2.

Additional Adjunctive Therapies to Consider

  • Electrical stimulation may accelerate wound healing as adjunctive therapy (moderate-quality evidence), though it doesn't clearly improve complete healing rates 1, 3.

  • The most common adverse effect of electrical stimulation is skin irritation, and frail elderly patients are more susceptible to adverse events 1, 3.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Antibiotics and antiseptics for pressure ulcers.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2016

Guideline

Tratamiento Farmacológico de las Úlceras por Presión

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Treatment for Stage 2 Sacral Decubitus Ulcers

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Management of chronic pressure ulcers: an evidence-based analysis.

Ontario health technology assessment series, 2009

Research

Problems encountered managing pressure ulceration of the sacrum.

British journal of community nursing, 2008

Research

An appraisal of povidone-iodine and wound healing.

Postgraduate medical journal, 1993

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.