What is the most likely diagnosis for a patient with a 2.5 cm flesh-colored nodule with telangiectasia on the nose after months of sporadic sunscreen use and sun exposure?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 31, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Basal Cell Carcinoma

The most likely diagnosis is basal cell carcinoma (BCC), specifically the nodular subtype, given the presentation of a 2.5 cm flesh-colored nodule with telangiectasia on the nose in a patient with chronic sun exposure and sporadic sunscreen use. 1

Clinical Reasoning

Key Diagnostic Features

  • Location: The nose is one of the most common sites for BCC, representing a sun-exposed area with unique vulnerability to environmental damage 2
  • Morphology: The flesh-colored nodule with telangiectasia is pathognomonic for nodular BCC, which accounts for approximately 59% of all BCC cases 3
  • Size and Duration: A 2.5 cm lesion present for several months is consistent with BCC's characteristic slow growth pattern 1
  • Associated findings: BCC commonly occurs in concomitance with other chronic sun exposure markers such as actinic keratoses, solar lentigines, and facial telangiectasia 3

Risk Factor Analysis

The patient's profile aligns perfectly with established BCC risk factors:

  • UV exposure history: Chronic sunbathing with sporadic sunscreen use represents the most significant etiological factor for BCC 1, 4
  • Anatomic site: Over 80% of BCCs occur on sun-exposed skin areas, with the head and neck being predominant locations 3
  • Clinical behavior: The non-bleeding, non-pruritic nature is typical of BCC, which is a slow-growing, locally invasive malignancy 1

Histologic Confirmation

While dermatologists can make a confident clinical diagnosis in most cases, biopsy confirmation is indicated in this case given the lesion size (2.5 cm) and the fact that one was already performed 1. The histological subtype will influence treatment selection and prognosis, particularly distinguishing between nodular BCC and more aggressive variants (morphoeic, micronodular, infiltrative) 1.

Prognostic Considerations

High-Risk Features to Assess

The British Journal of Dermatology guidelines identify several factors that influence recurrence risk 1:

  • Tumor size: This 2.5 cm lesion represents increased recurrence risk compared to smaller lesions 1
  • Tumor site: Central facial location (nose) places this in a higher-risk category 1
  • Clinical margins: Assessment of margin definition is critical, as poorly defined lesions carry higher recurrence risk 1

Location-Specific Concerns

Nasal BCCs warrant particular attention because they occur in "danger zones" where tumors are more likely to invade easily and resist treatment 2. The nose's unique position of exposure makes it one of the most common facial sites for malignancy 2.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Assuming benign diagnosis: As demonstrated in recent case reports, BCCs can initially be misdiagnosed as benign vascular tumors based on clinical appearance alone 5
  • Inadequate excision margins: Careful planning with wide excision margins is crucial, as BCCs can resemble benign lesions and residual tumor cells at resection margins lead to recurrence 5
  • Overlooking aggressive subtypes: While nodular BCC is most common, morphoeic, micronodular, and infiltrative variants are particularly associated with aggressive tissue invasion and require more extensive treatment 1

Metastasis and Mortality

Metastasis from BCC is extremely rare, and morbidity results primarily from local tissue invasion and destruction, particularly on the face, head, and neck 1. In the study cohort of 422 BCC patients, there were no cases with metastasis or fatal outcome, though the overall recurrence rate was 9.7% 3.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

A Clinical Study of Basal Cell Carcinoma.

Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina), 2019

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.