What is the role of Opdualag (nivolumab and relatlimab) in treating a patient with advanced or metastatic melanoma?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 13, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Opdualag (Nivolumab + Relatlimab) for Melanoma

Opdualag (nivolumab 480 mg + relatlimab 160 mg fixed-dose combination) is a reasonable first-line treatment option for unresectable or metastatic melanoma, offering improved progression-free survival over nivolumab monotherapy with a more favorable toxicity profile than nivolumab plus ipilimumab, though it has not yet demonstrated a statistically significant overall survival benefit. 1

Primary Treatment Indications

Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma (First-Line)

For BRAF wild-type disease, nivolumab plus relatlimab is one of four reasonable first-line options alongside nivolumab plus ipilimumab, single-agent nivolumab, and single-agent pembrolizumab. 1

  • The RELATIVITY-047 trial demonstrated median PFS of 10.2 months with nivolumab plus relatlimab versus 4.6 months with nivolumab alone (HR 0.75-0.78), representing approximately 5.5 months of additional disease control 1, 2
  • The objective response rate was 43.1% with combination therapy versus 32.6% with nivolumab monotherapy, a 10.5 percentage-point improvement 2
  • Median overall survival was not reached with the combination versus 34.1 months with nivolumab alone (HR 0.80), but this did not meet the prespecified statistical threshold for significance (p=0.059) 2

For BRAF-mutant disease, nivolumab plus relatlimab is one of seven reasonable first-line options, including targeted therapy combinations (dabrafenib plus trametinib, encorafenib plus binimetinib, vemurafenib plus cobimetinib). 1

Neoadjuvant Setting (Resectable Stage III/Oligometastatic Stage IV)

Nivolumab 480 mg plus relatlimab 160 mg every 4 weeks for 2 doses before surgery, followed by 10 adjuvant doses, is an NCCN Category 2A "other recommended regimen" for resectable stage IIIB-D or oligometastatic stage IV melanoma. 1

  • The neoadjuvant regimen achieved a 57% pathologic complete response rate and 70% overall pathologic response rate in 30 patients 1, 3
  • No grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events occurred during neoadjuvant treatment 1, 3
  • Two-year recurrence-free survival was 92% for pathologic responders versus 55% for non-responders (p=0.005) 1, 3

Toxicity Profile and Safety Considerations

Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occur in 18.9-21.1% of patients receiving nivolumab plus relatlimab, compared to 9.7-11.1% with nivolumab monotherapy but substantially lower than the 33-59% rate with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. 1, 2

  • The most common adverse events include fatigue, which occurs in 16-37% of patients on anti-PD-1 therapy 1
  • Immune-related adverse events typically manifest within the first 8-12 weeks of treatment, with skin toxicities often appearing first 1
  • Monitor for colitis, hepatitis, pneumonitis, endocrinopathies, and dermatologic toxicities throughout treatment 4
  • Patients have increased susceptibility to severe infections, particularly tuberculosis and bacterial infections, due to PD-1 blockade impairing normal immune responses 4

Treatment Administration and Duration

Administer nivolumab 480 mg plus relatlimab 160 mg intravenously every 4 weeks. 1, 2

  • Treatment can be continued beyond 2 years if ongoing response is demonstrated 5
  • For patients achieving complete response after ≥6 months of therapy, treatment discontinuation can be considered, with 85-90% remaining disease-free 5
  • In the neoadjuvant setting, start treatment within 13 weeks of planned surgery 4

Clinical Decision-Making Algorithm

Choose nivolumab plus relatlimab when:

  1. Patient has unresectable or metastatic melanoma requiring first-line systemic therapy
  2. Patient desires combination immunotherapy for improved PFS over single-agent therapy
  3. Patient cannot tolerate or wishes to avoid the higher toxicity of nivolumab plus ipilimumab
  4. Patient has resectable stage III disease and is a candidate for neoadjuvant therapy with favorable toxicity profile

Avoid nivolumab plus relatlimab when:

  1. Patient has brain metastases—nivolumab plus ipilimumab is preferred based on phase II trial data showing superior intracranial response 1
  2. Patient prioritizes overall survival data over PFS, as OS benefit has not been definitively established 2
  3. Patient has contraindications to immunotherapy and has BRAF V600E/K mutation—use dabrafenib plus trametinib instead 4

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

  • Do not assume OS benefit: While PFS is improved, the combination has not yet demonstrated statistically significant overall survival benefit over nivolumab monotherapy, unlike nivolumab plus ipilimumab which has shown clear OS advantage 1, 2
  • Recognize the trade-off: This regimen occupies a middle ground—better efficacy than single-agent therapy but less toxic than nivolumab plus ipilimumab, yet without the proven survival benefit of the latter 1
  • Consider disease burden: Patients with rapidly progressive disease or high tumor burden may benefit more from the more aggressive nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination despite higher toxicity 1
  • BRAF testing is mandatory: Always confirm BRAF mutation status before initiating therapy, as this determines the full range of treatment options including targeted therapy 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Adjuvant Immunotherapy for Completely Resected Stage IV Melanoma with Lung-Only Metastases

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Oligometastatic Melanoma with Bilateral Lung Metastases

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Related Questions

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.