What are the recommendations for stopping dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor, such as clopidogrel or prasugrel) in adult patients with coronary artery disease who have received drug-eluting stents?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 20, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

STOP-DAPT Trial Summary

The STOP-DAPT trial was a prospective multicenter Japanese study that demonstrated stopping dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) at 3 months after cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES) implantation was safe and potentially superior to prolonged DAPT regimens, with a primary endpoint incidence of only 2.8% at 1 year. 1

Trial Design and Population

  • Study structure: Prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial conducted across 58 Japanese centers between September 2012 and October 2013 1
  • Enrollment: 1,525 patients with complete 1-year follow-up in 1,519 patients (99.6% follow-up rate) 1
  • Intervention: Thienopyridine discontinued within 4 months in 94.7% of patients (1,444 patients), with aspirin monotherapy continued thereafter 1
  • Stent type: All patients received cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES), representing contemporary drug-eluting stent technology 1

Primary Endpoint Results

  • Composite primary endpoint: Cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, definite stent thrombosis, and TIMI major/minor bleeding at 1 year 1
  • Cumulative 1-year incidence: 2.8% (upper 97.5% CI: 3.6%), which was significantly lower than the pre-defined performance goal of 6.6% (P < 0.0001) 1
  • Event rates beyond 3 months were remarkably low: cardiovascular death 0.5%, MI 0.1%, stent thrombosis 0%, stroke 0.7%, and TIMI major/minor bleeding 0.8% 1

Comparison to Historical Controls (RESET Trial)

When compared to the RESET trial's CoCr-EES group (where nearly 90% continued DAPT at 1 year), STOP-DAPT demonstrated superior outcomes:

  • Primary endpoint: 2.8% in STOP-DAPT versus 4.0% in RESET (P = 0.06), with adjusted hazard ratio of 0.64 (95% CI 0.42-0.95, P = 0.03) 1
  • Stent thrombosis: Zero patients (0%) in STOP-DAPT versus 5 patients (0.3%) in RESET for definite/probable stent thrombosis (P = 0.03) 1
  • This comparison suggests that abbreviated DAPT may actually reduce thrombotic complications compared to prolonged regimens, likely due to reduced bleeding risk and better medication adherence 1

Clinical Implications and Context

The STOP-DAPT trial challenged the prevailing paradigm that longer DAPT duration is always better, demonstrating that 3-month DAPT can be safe in selected patients with contemporary drug-eluting stents. 1 This finding has been incorporated into current guidelines, where the 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guidelines now recommend that shorter-duration DAPT (1-3 months) with subsequent transition to P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy is reasonable in selected patients to reduce bleeding risk (Class IIa, Level A). 2

Important Caveats

  • Patient selection: The trial enrolled "selected patients," meaning those without high ischemic risk features or complex coronary anatomy 1
  • Stent technology: Results apply specifically to contemporary cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents, which have lower thrombogenicity than earlier-generation drug-eluting stents 3, 1
  • Geographic considerations: The trial was conducted exclusively in Japanese centers, and results may not fully generalize to all populations 1
  • Clinical presentation: The trial included both stable coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndrome patients, though specific subgroup analyses were not the primary focus 1

How STOP-DAPT Fits Current Practice

Current guidelines now support abbreviated DAPT strategies based on trials like STOP-DAPT, but emphasize individualized risk assessment: 2, 4

  • For stable CAD patients at high bleeding risk, 3-month DAPT may be reasonable (Class IIb) 2
  • For patients not at high bleeding or ischemic risk, stopping DAPT at 1-3 months may be considered 2
  • The default remains 6 months for stable CAD and 12 months for ACS, with flexibility based on bleeding and ischemic risk assessment 2, 4

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not apply 3-month DAPT to high ischemic risk patients (complex left main, bifurcation stenting, prior stent thrombosis, suboptimal stenting results) without careful consideration 2, 4
  • Do not assume all drug-eluting stents have the same safety profile with abbreviated DAPT; STOP-DAPT specifically used contemporary cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents 1
  • Do not stop DAPT early in ACS patients without documented high bleeding risk, as the default 12-month duration remains standard (Class I, Level B) 2, 4
  • Do not forget that STOP-DAPT used aspirin monotherapy after stopping the P2Y12 inhibitor, whereas newer strategies may favor P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after stopping aspirin 2, 4

Related Questions

What is the indication for continuing Daptomycin (Dapt) for 1 year after stent placement?
What is the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) post coronary stent installation?
What are the indications for Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT)?
What are the guidelines for cardiac stent placement and management, including choice of stent and antiplatelet therapy?
Do patients with drug-eluting (coronary artery) stents require anticoagulation therapy?
What is the safest pain management option for a patient with kidney stones, considering the use of Ansaid (flurbiprofen) 50mg or its equivalent?
What is the recommended treatment for a 14-year-old patient with severe acne, considering the use of Accutane (isotretinoin)?
What is the initial treatment approach for a patient presenting with sciatica?
What are the differences between vilazodone (Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor (SSRI)) and trazodone (Serotonin Antagonist and Reuptake Inhibitor (SARI)) in terms of side effect profile and dosing for an adult patient with a history of suicidal thoughts and potential Impaired renal or liver function?
What is the recommended treatment for a patient with a confirmed salmonella infection, particularly for high-risk individuals such as the elderly, young children, or immunocompromised patients?
Is it safe to start metformin (biguanide) in a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus and elevated liver enzymes, specifically alkaline phosphatase (ALP) of 172, aspartate transaminase (AST) of 50, and alanine transaminase (ALT) of 40?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.