What are the techniques for measuring cardiac output (CO) and the clinical significance of derived values in patients undergoing anesthesia?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 22, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Cardiac Output Measurement Techniques in Anesthesia

Physiological Factors Affecting Cardiac Output During Anesthesia

Anesthetic agents reduce cardiac output through multiple mechanisms that must be anticipated and managed proactively. 1

  • Age-related pharmacodynamic changes decrease anesthetic requirements progressively, with elderly patients requiring substantially lower doses of both inhalational and intravenous agents to achieve the same depth of anesthesia 1
  • Relative overdosing occurs commonly when doses are not adjusted for age, resulting in prolonged significant hypotension and reduced cardiac output 1
  • The "triple low" phenomenon (low BIS, hypotension despite low inspired agent concentration) is associated with higher mortality and prolonged hospital stay, reflecting excessive myocardial depression 1
  • Poorly compliant ventricles and vasculature in elderly patients make traditional preload assessment unreliable, as central venous pressure correlates poorly with blood volume and fluid responsiveness 1
  • Vasodilation from anesthetic agents reduces systemic vascular resistance, requiring careful titration of vasopressors once optimal intravascular volume is achieved 1

Invasive Cardiac Output Measurement Methods

Pulmonary Artery Catheter (PAC) - Thermodilution

Right heart catheterization with thermodilution remains the most accurate and best validated technique for cardiac output measurement, particularly in cardiac surgery patients. 1, 2

Indications:

  • Cardiac surgery with complex hemodynamics 1
  • Patients requiring simultaneous assessment of pulmonary artery pressures, mixed venous oxygen saturation, and cardiac output 2
  • Cardiac intensive care unit patients with structural heart disease 2

Contraindications:

  • Routine use in low-risk patients undergoing off-pump CABG (no mortality benefit demonstrated) 1
  • Octogenarian patients (propensity-matched analysis showed OR 1.24 for mortality, 95% CI 1.03-1.50) 1
  • High-risk patients in general cardiac surgery (OR 1.30 for mortality, 95% CI 1.14-1.48) 1

Complications:

  • Arrhythmias during insertion 1
  • Pulmonary embolism or hemorrhage 1
  • Technical errors including unreliable data or false interpretation 1

Measurement Technique:

  • Cold saline bolus injection into right atrium with temperature change detection at pulmonary artery thermistor 2, 3
  • Provides continuous mixed venous oxygen saturation monitoring 1
  • Allows calculation of derived hemodynamic parameters 3

Arterial Waveform Analysis (Pulse Contour Analysis)

Minimally invasive cardiac output devices using pulse contour analysis are frequently inaccurate at the extremes of measurement and at the limits of physiology. 1, 4

Indications:

  • Intraoperative monitoring when PAC is not indicated 1
  • Patients requiring frequent arterial blood gas analysis 1
  • Early detection of hypotension in high-risk patients 1

Limitations:

  • Poor agreement with PAC (mean percentage error 41%, exceeding the accepted 30% threshold) 1
  • Particularly inaccurate during CPB weaning with hemodynamic instability, temperature changes, and alterations in vascular tone 1
  • No clinical outcome studies validating their use 1
  • Requires arterial line calibration and may drift over time 5

Measurement Technique:

  • Algorithm-based calculation from arterial waveform characteristics 1
  • Provides stroke volume, stroke volume variation (SVV), pulse pressure variation (PPV), and cardiac index 1
  • SVV calculation: [(SVmax - SVmin) / SVmean] × 100 during mechanical ventilation 6

Transpulmonary Thermodilution

This technique provides accurate cardiac output measurement with less invasiveness than PAC. 3, 7

Measurement Technique:

  • Cold indicator injection via central venous catheter with detection at femoral or axillary arterial thermistor 3
  • Based on simple physical principles with minimal assumptions 7
  • More reliable than mathematical modeling-based devices 7

Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Measurement Methods

Transthoracic/Transesophageal Echocardiography

Echocardiography is recommended as the initial diagnostic study in the setting of shock and provides both cardiac output measurement and differential diagnosis. 1

Indications for Intraoperative TEE:

  • All open-heart (valvular) and thoracic aortic procedures 1
  • Selected CABG operations, particularly with acute life-threatening hemodynamic instability 1
  • Assessment of ventricular contractility, structural abnormalities, and surgical results 1

Contraindications:

  • Esophageal pathology (stricture, varices, tumor, recent surgery) 1
  • Routine use requires reconsideration given national audit data showing major complications in 0.08% and mortality in 0.03% of cases 1

Measurement Technique:

  • Stroke Volume = LVOT Cross-Sectional Area × LVOT VTI 6
  • LVOT diameter measured mid-systole from parasternal long-axis view, inner-edge to inner-edge 6
  • CSA = π × (LVOT diameter)² / 4 6
  • VTI obtained by tracing Doppler flow signal with sample volume 0.5 cm proximal to valve 6
  • Cardiac Output = Stroke Volume × Heart Rate 3

Limitations:

  • High operator dependency 5
  • Requires specific training and competence 1
  • Spontaneous breathing or inadequate ventilator synchronization invalidates SVV measurement 6
  • Improper Doppler beam alignment underestimates VTI and stroke volume 6

Esophageal Doppler Monitoring

Doppler directed at the aorta may be less accurate in elderly patients due to poor aortic compliance, potentially overestimating cardiac output and resulting in insufficient fluid resuscitation. 1

Indications:

  • NICE guidelines recommend consideration for major or high-risk surgery 1
  • Limited evidence in elderly and emergency surgery populations 1

Measurement Technique:

  • Continuous wave Doppler measurement of descending aortic blood flow 3
  • Provides stroke volume and cardiac output estimates 5

CO₂ Rebreathing Methods

Foreign gas rebreathing using acetylene or nitrous oxide has been shown to be reliable and safe for noninvasive cardiac output assessment during exercise, but requires patient cooperation. 1

Limitations:

  • Requires subject cooperation, difficult in some patients 1
  • High CO₂ concentrations may cause lightheadedness or feelings of suffocation 1
  • Accuracy compromised in advanced pulmonary disease 1
  • Not routinely used in anesthesia practice 1

Bioimpedance and Bioreactance

These techniques provide non-invasive continuous monitoring but are primarily used in investigational settings. 3, 5

Measurement Technique:

  • Electrical impedance changes across thorax correlate with stroke volume 3
  • Bioreactance measures phase shifts in electrical currents 3

Limitations:

  • Currently limited to investigational use 5
  • Accuracy concerns in clinical practice 7

Clinical Significance of Derived Hemodynamic Values

Cardiac Index (CI)

Maintain Cardiac Index ≥ 2.2 L/min/m² individualized to the patient during surgery using appropriate vasopressors and inotropes. 1

  • Normalizes cardiac output to body surface area 3
  • More meaningful than absolute cardiac output for comparing between patients 3
  • Goal-directed hemodynamic therapy (GDHT) targets CI optimization in high-risk patients 1

Stroke Volume (SV) and Stroke Volume Variation (SVV)

Using stroke volume as a guide to resuscitation and vasopressor use is likely to reduce unnecessary fluid overload and improve outcomes. 1

  • SV = Cardiac Output / Heart Rate 3
  • SVV predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients 6
  • SVV >12-15% typically indicates fluid responsiveness 6
  • Tidal volume dependency: SVV increases proportionally with tidal volume depth 6
  • Maximizing stroke volume may not always be correct; avoiding hypovolemia and hypotension while ensuring adequate perfusion is key 1

Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR) and SVR Index (SVRI)

SVR = (MAP - CVP) / CO × 80 (in dynes·sec·cm⁻⁵) 3

  • Normal range: 800-1200 dynes·sec·cm⁻⁵ 3
  • SVRI normalizes to body surface area 3
  • Guides vasopressor vs. inotrope selection 1
  • Low SVR with adequate CO suggests need for vasopressors (norepinephrine first-line) 1
  • High SVR with low CO suggests need for afterload reduction 3

Left Ventricular Stroke Work (LVSW) and LVSW Index (LVSWI)

LVSW = SV × (MAP - PCWP) × 0.0136 (in gram-meters) 3

  • Reflects myocardial contractility and work performed per beat 3
  • LVSWI normalizes to body surface area 3
  • Decreased LVSW indicates impaired contractility requiring inotropic support 3
  • Useful for differentiating cardiogenic from distributive shock 3

Pulmonary Vascular Resistance (PVR) and PVR Index (PVRI)

PVR = (MPAP - PCWP) / CO × 80 (in dynes·sec·cm⁻⁵) 3

  • Normal range: 20-120 dynes·sec·cm⁻⁵ 3
  • PVRI normalizes to body surface area 3
  • Elevated PVR indicates pulmonary hypertension requiring specific management 3
  • Guides use of pulmonary vasodilators (inhaled nitric oxide, prostacyclin) 3
  • Important in right ventricular failure assessment 3

Practical Recommendations for Anesthesia Practice

Arterial lines and/or central venous pressure catheters should be considered at an early stage in elderly unwell patients to aid physiological assessment and deliver vasopressors. 1

  • Maintain MAP 60-65 mmHg during surgery to reduce end-organ injury 1
  • Recent UK data in patients >65 years showed no mortality difference between MAP targets of 60 vs. 65 mmHg 1
  • Optimize flow before commencing vasopressors 1
  • Administer fluid therapy with great care in divided boluses to assess response 1
  • Norepinephrine is first-line vasopressor for sepsis or vasodilatory shock, safe via large peripheral vein until central access established 1
  • Consider bedside transthoracic echocardiography for hemodynamically unstable patients to assess contractility and guide inotrope/vasopressor use 1
  • GDHT should be considered during surgery in high-risk patients to optimize cardiac index 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not rely on CVP alone for volume assessment in elderly patients with poorly compliant ventricles 1
  • Verify critical values with direct measurement rather than unvalidated digital displays 4
  • Avoid routine PAC use in low-risk or elderly patients given mortality data 1
  • Do not assume pulse contour analysis accuracy during hemodynamic instability or CPB weaning 1
  • Ensure adequate training before using any cardiac output monitoring device 1
  • Adjust anesthetic doses for age to prevent the "triple low" phenomenon 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Cardiac output monitoring - invasive and noninvasive.

Current opinion in critical care, 2022

Guideline

Accuracy of Digital Fluid Measurement Devices

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

What technique should I use to measure cardiac output?

Current opinion in critical care, 2007

Guideline

Stroke Volume Variation Calculation and Measurement

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Measuring cardiac output at the bedside.

Current opinion in critical care, 2019

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.