What was the purpose of the SUSTAIN study in patients with type 2 diabetes?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 27, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

What was the SUSTAIN Study?

The SUSTAIN clinical trial program was a comprehensive series of phase 3 trials (SUSTAIN 1-11) evaluating the efficacy and safety of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide (a GLP-1 receptor agonist) for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, with SUSTAIN-6 specifically designed as a cardiovascular outcomes trial to assess cardiovascular safety and benefits. 1, 2

Primary Purpose of the SUSTAIN Program

The SUSTAIN trials evaluated semaglutide across the full spectrum of type 2 diabetes management, enrolling over 8,000 patients in various clinical scenarios 3:

  • Glycemic control assessment: Comparing semaglutide to placebo, other GLP-1 receptor agonists, SGLT2 inhibitors, and insulin regimens 4, 5, 6, 7
  • Weight reduction outcomes: Demonstrating consistent weight loss across all trials 3
  • Cardiovascular safety evaluation: Meeting regulatory requirements for new diabetes medications 1, 2

SUSTAIN-6: The Cardiovascular Outcomes Trial

SUSTAIN-6 (NCT01720446) was specifically designed as a multi-center, multi-national, placebo-controlled, double-blind cardiovascular outcomes trial that demonstrated semaglutide reduced major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) by 26% compared to placebo (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.58-0.95; P<0.001). 1, 2

Key Trial Design Features 2:

  • Population: 3,297 patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
  • Duration: Minimum observation time of 2 years (median 2.1 years)
  • Primary endpoint: Time to first occurrence of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke
  • Eligibility criteria: Patients ≥50 years with established cardiovascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral artery disease, chronic kidney disease, or NYHA class II-III heart failure; OR patients ≥60 years with specified cardiovascular risk factors

SUSTAIN-6 Results 1, 2:

  • MACE reduction: 6.6% in semaglutide group vs. 8.9% in placebo group
  • Non-fatal stroke reduction: Significant benefit (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.38-0.99)
  • Cardiovascular death: No significant difference (HR 0.98)
  • Non-fatal MI: Trend toward benefit but not statistically significant (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.51-1.08)

Clinical Impact and Guideline Recognition

Based on SUSTAIN-6 results, major cardiovascular and diabetes guidelines now strongly recommend semaglutide specifically for patients with type 2 diabetes and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or high cardiovascular risk. 1, 8

The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association recommend initiating semaglutide 1:

  • At the time of diagnosis of clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
  • At the time of type 2 diabetes diagnosis in patients with established cardiovascular disease
  • At hospital discharge after admission for an atherosclerotic cardiovascular event
  • In patients determined to be at high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

Important Context from Other SUSTAIN Trials

SUSTAIN 10 compared the most frequently prescribed doses in clinical practice: semaglutide 1.0 mg weekly versus liraglutide 1.2 mg daily, demonstrating superior HbA1c reduction (-1.7% vs -1.0%, P<0.0001) and greater weight loss (-5.8 kg vs -1.9 kg, P<0.0001) with semaglutide. 4

SUSTAIN FORTE evaluated a higher 2.0 mg dose for patients needing additional glycemic control, showing superior HbA1c reduction compared to the standard 1.0 mg dose (ETD -0.23 percentage points, P=0.0003). 6

SUSTAIN China confirmed efficacy and safety in Asian populations, with semaglutide superior to sitagliptin for both glycemic control and weight reduction. 5

Safety Profile Across SUSTAIN Trials

The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea), occurring in 15-20% of patients, typically transient and dose-dependent 8, 3. Higher rates of gastrointestinal adverse events and treatment discontinuation occurred with semaglutide compared to active comparators (43.9% vs 38.3% for GI disorders in SUSTAIN 10). 4

Related Questions

What is the dosage of semaglutide (GLP-1 receptor agonist)?
What is the focus of the study on semaglutide (Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist) in patients with type 2 diabetes?
What is the best treatment plan for a 49-year-old female with poorly controlled diabetes (A1C level of 9), currently taking metformin and Ozempic (semaglutide) 1 mg?
What considerations should be taken when starting Ozempic (semaglutide) in a patient with hyperglycemia, currently only on metformin (biguanide)?
What are the key findings and implications of the SUSTAIN 1 trial for the management of type 2 diabetes, particularly regarding the use of semaglutide (Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist)?
What are the guidelines for enteral nutrition in pediatric patients?
Can amitriptyline (tricyclic antidepressant) and levosulpiride (prokinetic agent) be used together in a patient with functional dyspepsia who has not responded to first-line treatments?
What is the role of lactate in a patient with suspected sepsis, possible intra-abdominal bleeding, and hypotension?
What is the role of lactate (lactic acid) in a patient with suspected sepsis, possible intra-abdominal bleeding, and hypotension?
What is the recommended use of vasopressin (antidiuretic hormone) in adult patients with septic shock who remain hypotensive despite fluid resuscitation and norepinephrine (Levophed) therapy?
What are the health economic benefits of administering Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP1) receptor agonists (RAs) to patients with type 2 diabetes?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.