What is the approach to ruling out and diagnosing traumatic brain injury (TBI) secondary to trauma in a patient with a history of head injury, considering their mechanism of injury, level of consciousness, and past medical history?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 31, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Approach to Ruling Out and Diagnosing Traumatic Brain Injury

The initial assessment of TBI severity relies on the Glasgow Coma Scale (specifically the motor component), pupillary size and reactivity, followed by non-contrast head CT based on validated clinical decision rules to identify patients requiring imaging. 1

Initial Clinical Assessment

Primary Severity Classification

  • Assess GCS score immediately, documenting all three components (Eye-Verbal-Motor), with particular emphasis on the motor response as it remains the most robust predictor even in sedated patients 1, 2

    • Mild TBI: GCS 13-15
    • Moderate TBI: GCS 9-12
    • Severe TBI: GCS 3-8 2
  • Evaluate pupillary size and reactivity as these are key predictors of neurological outcome at 6 months, validated in studies of over 15,000 patients 1

Critical Secondary Insult Detection

  • Immediately identify and correct systemic factors that worsen outcomes:
    • Hypotension (systolic BP <90 mmHg for ≥5 minutes) increases mortality significantly 1
    • Hypoxemia (SaO2 <90%) is associated with increased mortality, with duration of hypoxemic episodes being particularly deleterious 1
    • The combination of hypotension and hypoxemia carries a 75% mortality rate 1

Neuroimaging Decision-Making

For Mild TBI (GCS 13-15)

Level A Recommendation: Perform non-contrast head CT if the patient has loss of consciousness OR post-traumatic amnesia PLUS any of the following: 1

  • Headache
  • Vomiting
  • Age >60 years
  • Drug or alcohol intoxication
  • Deficits in short-term memory
  • Physical evidence of trauma above the clavicle
  • Post-traumatic seizure
  • GCS score <15
  • Focal neurologic deficit
  • Coagulopathy

Level B Recommendation: Consider non-contrast head CT even WITHOUT loss of consciousness or amnesia if: 1

  • Focal neurologic deficit present
  • Vomiting
  • Severe headache
  • Age ≥65 years
  • Physical signs of basilar skull fracture
  • GCS score <15
  • Coagulopathy
  • Dangerous mechanism of injury (ejection from vehicle, pedestrian struck, fall >3 feet or 5 stairs)

Validated Clinical Decision Rules

Three major prediction rules can safely identify patients who can avoid CT (sensitivity 97-100%): 1

Canadian CT Head Rule (for GCS 13-15):

  • High-risk factors: GCS <15 at 2 hours, suspected open skull fracture, signs of basilar skull fracture, ≥2 episodes of vomiting, age ≥65 years, amnesia >30 minutes before impact, dangerous mechanism 1

New Orleans Criteria (for GCS 15 only):

  • Headache, vomiting, age >60 years, drug/alcohol intoxication, persistent anterograde amnesia, visible trauma above clavicles, seizure 1

For Moderate to Severe TBI (GCS ≤12)

  • Non-contrast head CT is mandatory for all patients 1, 2

Serial Neurological Monitoring

Frequency of Reassessment

Repeat clinical examination is essential to detect secondary neurological deterioration: 1

  • For moderate TBI (GCS 9-13): Every 15-30 minutes for first 2 hours, then hourly for 4-12 hours depending on protocol 1
  • Any decrease of ≥2 points in GCS or new neurological deficit mandates repeat CT scan 1

Repeat Imaging Indications

  • Perform repeat CT for any neurological deterioration (Class I recommendation) 1
  • Routine repeat CT is NOT recommended for mild TBI with negative initial CT (only 2.3-3.9% show management changes) 1
  • Exception: Anticoagulated patients with abnormal initial CT warrant repeat imaging 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

The "Mild" TBI Misnomer

  • Up to 15% of patients with GCS 15 have acute intracranial lesions on CT, and <1% require neurosurgical intervention 1, 2
  • 5-15% of mild TBI patients have compromised function at 1 year, despite the "mild" label 2
  • Absence of loss of consciousness does NOT exclude significant injury: 1.8% of patients without LOC have intracranial lesions, and 0.6% require neurosurgery 3

Imaging Limitations

  • Negative CT does not exclude clinically significant TBI, particularly diffuse axonal injury or hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy 1
  • Patients with GCS 13-15 but intraparenchymal lesions on CT perform neuropsychologically similar to moderate TBI patients 4
  • MRI is more sensitive for axonal injury but is NOT routinely recommended in acute mild TBI 1

Special Populations

  • Anticoagulated patients require lower threshold for imaging and consideration of repeat CT 1
  • Elderly patients (≥60-65 years) have higher risk and warrant imaging even with minimal symptoms 1, 3

Documentation Requirements

  • Record pre-sedation GCS (especially motor component) and pupillary exam before any sedation or intubation, as these cannot be reliably assessed afterward 1, 4
  • Document mechanism of injury, duration of any loss of consciousness (<30 minutes for mild TBI), and duration of post-traumatic amnesia (<24 hours for mild TBI) 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Classification of Traumatic Brain Injury by Severity

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Traumatismo Craneoencefálico sin Pérdida de Conocimiento

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Assessing Traumatic Brain Injury Severity in Induced Coma Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.