What is the primary approach to managing a patient with HPV (Human Papillomavirus)-negative cervical adenocarcinoma?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 4, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of HPV-Negative Cervical Adenocarcinoma

HPV-negative cervical adenocarcinoma should be managed with stage-appropriate surgical resection or definitive chemoradiation, following the same FIGO staging-based treatment algorithms as HPV-positive disease, but with heightened vigilance for more aggressive behavior and worse prognosis. 1

Critical Recognition and Diagnostic Considerations

HPV-negative cervical adenocarcinomas represent a distinct biological entity comprising 5-11% of all cervical cancers, with fundamentally different molecular characteristics than HPV-associated tumors. 2, 3

Key histologic subtypes that are typically HPV-independent include:

  • Clear-cell adenocarcinoma 1
  • Mesonephric adenocarcinoma 1
  • Gastric-type adenocarcinoma 3
  • Endometrioid carcinoma 3

These tumors exhibit specific molecular alterations including TP53, PIK3CA, KRAS, STK11, and PTEN mutations rather than HPV E6/E7 oncogene expression. 3 They demonstrate lower proliferative activity, p53 immunostaining positivity, and decreased expression of p16, p14, and p27. 4

Staging and Pretreatment Evaluation

Complete staging workup must include:

  • Contrast-enhanced CT or MRI for anatomic assessment of tumor size, stromal penetration, parametrial involvement, and vaginal extension 1
  • PET-CT scan for lymph node assessment and distant metastases, with 53-73% sensitivity and 90-97% specificity for early-stage lymph node involvement 1
  • Clinical examination under anesthesia for FIGO staging 1

Critical pitfall: HPV-negative tumors are frequently diagnosed at more advanced FIGO stages with higher rates of lymph node involvement and lymphovascular invasion compared to HPV-positive disease. 2, 4 This necessitates thorough staging before treatment decisions.

Stage-Specific Treatment Algorithm

Early-Stage Disease (FIGO IA1 without LVSI)

  • Conization or simple trachelectomy for microinvasive disease without lymphovascular space invasion 1
  • Fertility preservation is possible in highly selected cases 1

Early-Stage Disease (FIGO IA2-IB1)

  • Radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy is the primary surgical approach 1
  • Surgical margins >5mm are recommended when technically feasible 1
  • Adjuvant therapy decisions based on pathologic risk factors:
    • High-risk features (positive margins, extranodal extension): platinum-based concurrent chemoradiation 5
    • Intermediate-risk features (perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, close margins <5mm, T3-T4a tumors): consider adjuvant radiation 5

Locally Advanced Disease (FIGO IB2-IVA)

  • Platinum-based concurrent chemoradiation is the primary treatment modality 5
  • Surgery is generally not recommended as initial therapy for advanced-stage HPV-negative disease given insufficient evidence and typically more aggressive biology 1

Recurrent, Persistent, or Metastatic Disease

  • Combination chemotherapy with bevacizumab (anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody) improves survival 5
  • Salvage surgery may be considered for isolated recurrences in previously irradiated fields 5

HPV-Negative Specific Considerations

HPV-negative cervical adenocarcinomas demonstrate:

  • More aggressive clinical behavior with worse overall prognosis compared to HPV-positive tumors 2, 4
  • Higher rates of distant metastasis even in early stages 4
  • Reduced response to standard chemotherapy and immunotherapy due to immune-cold tumor microenvironment 3
  • Earlier and more frequent lymph node involvement 4

Emerging targeted therapy options for selected patients include PI3K/mTOR inhibitors and KRAS inhibitors based on molecular profiling, though these remain investigational. 3

Post-Treatment Surveillance

Follow-up protocol:

  • Pelvic examinations every 3-4 months for the first 2 years, then every 6 months for years 3-5 5
  • Imaging (CT or PET-CT) as clinically indicated for suspected recurrence 1
  • Continue surveillance for at least 25 years given the aggressive nature of HPV-negative disease 6

Common pitfall: Do not assume HPV-negative status represents a false-negative result without confirming histologic subtype, as truly HPV-independent adenocarcinomas require recognition of their distinct aggressive biology and potentially different therapeutic approaches. 2, 3

Fertility Preservation Considerations

Fertility-sparing approaches should be considered only in highly selected patients with stage IA1-IA2 disease, negative lymph nodes, and tumor size <2cm, with full counseling about increased recurrence risk given the more aggressive nature of HPV-negative disease. 1 Radical trachelectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy may be considered in these exceptional cases, though data specific to HPV-negative tumors is limited.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

HPV-Independent Cervical Cancer-A New Challenge of Modern Oncology.

International journal of molecular sciences, 2025

Research

Human papillomavirus-independent cervical cancer.

International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2022

Research

Cervical Cancer: Evaluation and Management.

American family physician, 2018

Guideline

Post-LEEP Pap Surveillance Schedule

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.