What are the ECG characteristics of ventricular pacing?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 14, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

ECG Characteristics of Ventricular Pacing

Ventricular pacing produces a wide QRS complex (≥120 ms) with a left bundle branch block (LBBB) morphology when pacing from the right ventricle, characterized by broad, deep S waves with no R waves in leads V1-V3, and the absence of the RSR' pattern that defines right bundle branch block. 1, 2

Fundamental ECG Features of Right Ventricular Pacing

QRS Morphology in Precordial Leads

  • Right ventricular apical pacing produces a LBBB pattern with broad, deep S waves and absent R waves in the right precordial leads (V1-V3), which is the opposite pattern of right bundle branch block 1, 2
  • Lead V1 typically shows a QS complex (entirely negative deflection) or deep S waves during standard RV pacing 3
  • The absence of RSR' pattern in V1-V3 is expected during normal RV pacing, as this pattern would indicate right bundle branch block morphology 1, 4
  • Lead V6 demonstrates broad, monophasic R waves consistent with LBBB morphology 5

QRS Duration and Timing

  • The paced QRS complex is wide, typically ≥120 ms in adults, reflecting abnormal ventricular activation from the pacing site 6
  • R wave peak time in V6 is prolonged during RV pacing due to delayed left ventricular activation 7, 8
  • A latency interval (delay from pacemaker stimulus to QRS onset) may be present, particularly with left ventricular pacing, and is more pronounced than with RV pacing 3

Critical Diagnostic Pitfall: RBBB Pattern During RV Pacing

When RBBB Morphology Appears

  • If an RSR' pattern or RBBB morphology appears during transvenous RV pacing, myocardial perforation or lead malposition must be ruled out immediately, even in asymptomatic patients 2
  • The presence of RBBB pattern (RSR', rsR', rSR' in V1-V2) during intended RV pacing is abnormal and potentially dangerous 4, 2
  • Chest X-ray and echocardiography are mandatory to confirm proper lead position and exclude perforation when RBBB pattern is observed 2

Rare Exception

  • In extremely rare cases, a "safe" RBBB pattern can occur with confirmed RV pacing due to unusual septal anatomy or lead position, but this diagnosis requires definitive imaging confirmation 2

Biventricular and Left Bundle Branch Pacing Patterns

Biventricular Pacing Characteristics

  • Simultaneous BiV pacing with marked LV latency may produce a QRS dominated by RV pacing with LBBB configuration and QS complex in V1 3
  • Programming LV-before-RV timing (V-V interval) often restores a dominant R wave in V1, representing visible LV contribution to depolarization 3
  • Negative QRS in V1 during BiV pacing with short PR interval most likely indicates ventricular fusion with intrinsic rhythm, which can falsely narrow the QRS and simulate appropriate capture 3

Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing (LBBAP)

  • LBBAP produces distinct V1 morphologies: Qr pattern (60.7%), qR (19.6%), rSR' (7.1%), or QS (12.5%) 8
  • The terminal R' wave duration in V1 is significantly shorter during LBBAP (51 ± 12 ms) compared to native RBBB (85 ± 19 ms), which helps differentiate these patterns 8
  • V6 R-wave peak time remains short and constant (approximately 65 ms) during left bundle capture, indicating physiological left ventricular activation 7, 8

Pacemaker Stimulus Characteristics

Visible Pacing Spikes

  • A sharp vertical deflection (pacing spike) precedes the QRS complex, marking the electrical stimulus delivery 3
  • The spike should be immediately followed by ventricular depolarization (captured beat) in properly functioning systems 3

Latency Considerations

  • Prolonged latency is more common with LV than RV pacing due to indirect stimulation through coronary veins and higher incidence of LV pathology including scars 3
  • Marked latency may require V-V interval programming to optimize BiV pacing patterns 3

Differential Diagnosis: Paced Rhythm vs. Ventricular Tachycardia

Key Distinguishing Features

  • Paced rhythms show regular pacing spikes before each QRS complex, while VT does not 6
  • During wide complex tachycardia, AV dissociation with visible P waves (marked by arrows on ECG) indicates VT rather than paced rhythm 6
  • If the diagnosis cannot be proven easily, treat as VT until proven otherwise, as medications for SVT (particularly verapamil or diltiazem) may precipitate hemodynamic collapse in VT 6

LBBB Morphology Tachycardia Criteria

  • R wave >30 ms duration in V1 or V2 suggests VT over paced rhythm 5
  • Any Q wave in V6 favors VT 5
  • Duration >60 ms from QRS onset to S wave nadir in V1 or V2 indicates VT 5
  • Notching on the downstroke of S wave in V1 or V2 suggests VT 5

Clinical Context and Reversible Causes

Before Attributing Findings to Pacing

  • Exclude reversible causes of conduction abnormalities: electrolyte abnormalities, medications, hypothermia, or inflammation near the AV junction 6, 1
  • Verify proper lead placement on chest X-ray, as incorrect positioning can create abnormal ECG patterns 1, 2

When to Suspect Malfunction

  • RBBB pattern during RV pacing requires immediate investigation 2
  • Loss of capture (pacing spikes without subsequent QRS) indicates lead or generator malfunction 3
  • Unexpected QRS morphology changes warrant lead position verification and threshold testing 3

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.