What is the best suture material for a modified Pomeroy’s tubal ligation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 20, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Modified Pomeroy's Tubal Ligation: Optimal Suture Selection

For modified Pomeroy's tubal ligation, chromic catgut (Option C) is the traditional and most appropriate choice, as it provides adequate tensile strength during the critical healing period while absorbing predictably to allow tubal separation and permanent occlusion. 1, 2

Rationale for Chromic Catgut

  • Chromic catgut is specifically designed for tubal ligation procedures because its absorption timeline (14-21 days) allows the ligated tubal segment to necrose and separate, creating permanent sterilization. 3

  • The suture must absorb relatively quickly to permit tubal devascularization and tissue necrosis, which is the fundamental mechanism of the Pomeroy technique. 3

  • Plain catgut absorbs too rapidly (5-7 days) and may cause premature knot failure before adequate tissue necrosis occurs. 3

Why NOT the Other Options

Vicryl (Option A) - Suboptimal Choice

  • Vicryl retains tensile strength for 2-3 weeks with complete absorption taking 56-70 days, which is too prolonged for Pomeroy's technique and may interfere with the intended tubal separation mechanism. 4, 5

  • While Vicryl causes less tissue inflammation than catgut, this property is actually disadvantageous in tubal ligation where you want controlled tissue necrosis. 4, 3

  • Vicryl is excellent for tissue approximation in reconstructive surgery but counterproductive when tissue destruction is the goal. 4

PDS (Option D) - Inappropriate Choice

  • PDS maintains 50% tensile strength at 6 weeks and takes 180-210 days for complete absorption, making it entirely unsuitable for Pomeroy's technique. 6, 5

  • PDS causes minimal inflammatory response and promotes tissue healing rather than necrosis, directly opposing the surgical objective. 6

  • The prolonged absorption profile prevents the intended tubal separation and may lead to recanalization failure. 5

Plain Catgut (Option B) - Too Rapid

  • Plain catgut loses tensile strength within 5-7 days, risking premature knot failure before adequate tubal devascularization. 3

  • The absorption is too unpredictable and may compromise the procedure's effectiveness. 3

Critical Technical Points

  • Use 0 or 2-0 chromic catgut for adequate knot security and tissue handling during the Pomeroy procedure. 3

  • Ensure the suture ligates a 2-3 cm segment of fallopian tube in the mid-isthmic portion for optimal failure rates. 7

  • The knot must remain secure for 10-14 days to allow complete ischemic necrosis of the ligated segment before absorption begins. 3

Common Pitfall to Avoid

Do not use modern synthetic absorbable sutures designed for tissue approximation and healing (Vicryl, PDS, Maxon) in procedures where controlled tissue necrosis is the intended outcome. These materials were specifically developed to minimize inflammation and promote healing, which directly contradicts the mechanism of tubal ligation. 4, 6

References

Guideline

Vaginal Suture Repair Post Normal Delivery

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Suture Material Selection for Gynecological Procedures

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Research

Histologic response to microsuture materials.

The Journal of reproductive medicine, 1988

Research

In-vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl, Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie, 1988

Research

Pomeroy tubal ligation by laparoscopy and minilaparotomy.

Advances in contraception : the official journal of the Society for the Advancement of Contraception, 1994

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.