Are antibiotics recommended for patients with an open chest after cardiac surgery (delayed sternal closure)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 21, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Open Chest After Cardiac Surgery

Yes, prophylactic antibiotics are recommended for patients with delayed sternal closure after cardiac surgery, and should be continued until the time of chest closure using standard first- or second-generation cephalosporins (cefazolin) rather than broad-spectrum agents. 1, 2

Recommended Antibiotic Regimen

First-Line Prophylaxis

  • Cefazolin remains the antibiotic of choice for delayed sternal closure, administered as 2g IV with redosing of 1g every 4 hours during prolonged open chest management 1
  • Alternative first-line options include cefamandole or cefuroxime 1.5g IV, with redosing of 0.75g every 2 hours 1
  • Standard prophylactic regimens (first- or second-generation cephalosporins) are as effective as broad-spectrum antibiotics and avoid unnecessary antimicrobial resistance 2, 3

Alternative Regimens for Special Circumstances

  • For patients with beta-lactam allergy: vancomycin 30 mg/kg over 120 minutes 1
  • For documented MRSA colonization or recent reoperation in MRSA-endemic units: add vancomycin to cefazolin 1, 4
  • Clindamycin 900 mg IV is another alternative for penicillin-allergic patients 1

Duration of Prophylaxis

Critical Timing Principles

  • Continue prophylactic antibiotics until the time of sternal closure, not beyond 1, 2
  • Maximum duration should not exceed 24 hours after chest closure 1
  • Abbreviated courses (stopping before closure) showed 0% infection rate in one study, though sample size was small 2
  • Extending antibiotics past the time of sternal closure does not reduce infection rates and may increase adverse effects 2

Evidence on Duration

The evidence shows substantial practice variation but clear outcomes: patients receiving antibiotics only until chest closure had 1.9% infection rates, while those continued past closure had 7.7% infection rates (though not statistically significant, p=0.352) 2. This suggests no benefit—and potential harm—from extended prophylaxis 2.

Key Evidence and Nuances

Adult Cardiac Surgery Data

  • In 167 adult patients with delayed sternal closure, routine antibiotic prophylaxis (78.4% of patients) resulted in 4.6% sternal SSI, compared to 8.3% in those switched to broad-spectrum agents (p=0.407) 2
  • Broad-spectrum antimicrobials showed no benefit and may increase adverse effects 2
  • Standard cephalosporin prophylaxis is supported by ACC/AHA guidelines for all cardiac surgery patients 5

Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Considerations

There is conflicting evidence in pediatric populations: one study suggested vancomycin + meropenem reduced combined bloodstream and surgical site infections (31% vs 67% with cefazolin alone, adjusted OR 0.09, p=0.003) 4. However, a systematic review of 2,203 pediatric patients found that "non-standard" broad-spectrum strategies had higher SSI rates (8.8%) compared to standard cephalosporin regimens (6.8%, p=0.001) 3. The systematic review's larger sample size and meta-analytic approach provides stronger evidence favoring standard prophylaxis even in pediatrics 3.

Microbiological Considerations

  • Standard cephalosporins provide adequate coverage against the most common pathogens: Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci 6
  • When broad-spectrum agents are used, there is a shift toward more Gram-negative infections without overall reduction in SSI rates 7
  • Beta-lactams with Gram-negative activity showed lower postoperative pneumonia and mortality in general cardiac surgery, but this does not translate to benefit in delayed sternal closure specifically 5, 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Do Not:

  • Switch to broad-spectrum antibiotics (e.g., vancomycin + meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam) without specific indication such as documented MRSA or established infection 2, 3
  • Continue prophylaxis beyond chest closure as this provides no additional benefit and increases resistance risk 1, 2
  • Confuse prophylaxis with treatment: if infection develops, switch to therapeutic regimens appropriate for the site and suspected pathogens 6, 8

Do:

  • Maintain standard cefazolin prophylaxis throughout the open chest period 1, 2, 3
  • Redose cefazolin every 4 hours during prolonged open chest management 1, 9
  • Discontinue prophylaxis within 24 hours of chest closure 1
  • Consider adding vancomycin only for documented MRSA colonization or high-risk scenarios 1, 4

Clinical Algorithm

  1. At initial surgery: Administer cefazolin 2g IV within 60 minutes before incision 1, 9
  2. If chest left open: Continue cefazolin 1g IV every 4 hours 1
  3. Special populations:
    • Beta-lactam allergy → vancomycin 30 mg/kg over 120 minutes, then every 12 hours 1
    • Known MRSA colonization → add vancomycin to cefazolin 1, 4
  4. At delayed sternal closure: Give final prophylactic dose at time of closure 1, 2
  5. Postoperatively: Discontinue within 24 hours of closure 1

The presence of chest tubes or drainage is not an indication to extend prophylaxis duration 1. If infection is suspected, transition to therapeutic antibiotics based on culture data and clinical presentation 6, 8.

References

Guideline

Recommended Duration of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Median Sternotomy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Open Chest Management After Pediatric Cardiac Surgery.

Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 2019

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Empiric Antibiotic Selection for Postoperative Wound Infections

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Cefazolin Redosing Requirements for Surgical Incision

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Related Questions

How to prevent and decrease the risk of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) after abdominal surgery?
What is the best antibiotic for prophylaxis after aortic surgery?
What is an alternative to ciprofloxacin (Cipro) for post-surgical prophylaxis?
What antibiotics (Antibacterial medications) are used for post-surgical infections?
What is the first-line antibiotic treatment for myocarditis when a bacterial cause is suspected?
Can netupitant be added to the anti‑emetic regimen for a patient receiving ifosfamide, and what are the recommended dosing, dexamethasone adjustments, and monitoring for drug interactions?
In a woman with systemic lupus erythematosus on hydroxychloroquine and low‑dose prednisone who experiences daily flushing episodes lasting less than four hours and a concurrent fever up to 38.3 °C, what are the likely causes and how should I evaluate and manage her?
How should type 3c diabetes caused by pancreatic exocrine disease (chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer, cystic fibrosis, or pancreatectomy) be managed?
What lupus-specific skin lesions should be considered in a female patient with known systemic lupus erythematosus on hydroxychloroquine and low-dose prednisone, with infection already excluded?
Four years after hemorrhoidectomy with lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) and fissurectomy, and currently continent, is the patient now safe from developing new fecal incontinence?
In a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus on hydroxychloroquine and low‑dose prednisone, can an acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (ACLE) rash persist for more than four hours and recur daily?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.