Management of Adult Female Scoliosis
For adult females with scoliosis, management is determined by curve severity: curves <15° require annual monitoring, curves 15-50° need physical therapy with core strengthening plus closer surveillance, and curves >50° warrant surgical evaluation due to progressive deterioration risk of approximately 1° per year. 1
Initial Diagnostic Evaluation
Obtain standing PA and lateral spine radiographs to establish baseline Cobb angle measurement, classify curve type, and assess skeletal maturity. 1 The Adams forward bend test combined with scoliometer measurement provides reliable clinical screening (sensitivity 84-90%, specificity 80-93%). 2
During physical examination, document:
- Shoulder height asymmetry and trunk balance 2
- Neurological status including reflexes, muscle strength, and presence of pes cavus 2
- Skin findings suggesting spinal dysraphism (hemangiomas, hairy patches, dermal sinuses) 2
- Red flags: left thoracic curve, rapid progression (>1°/month), functionally disruptive pain, or focal neurological deficits 2
Treatment Algorithm by Curve Magnitude
Curves <15° (Mild)
- Annual clinical evaluation using Adam's forward bend test 1
- Radiographic monitoring every 12-18 months for stable curves 1
- No active intervention required unless symptomatic 1
Curves 15-50° (Moderate)
- Physical therapy is the primary intervention, focusing specifically on core strengthening and postural awareness 1
- Physiotherapy scoliosis-specific exercises (PSSE) should include: (1) 3-dimensional self-correction, (2) training in activities of daily living, and (3) stabilization of corrected posture 3
- More frequent monitoring than mild curves to detect progression 1
- PSSE can temporarily stabilize progressive curves, improve back asymmetry, reduce secondary muscle imbalance and pain, and improve breathing function in thoracic curves 3
Critical pitfall: Do not substitute unsupervised home exercises for initial instruction by a physical therapist trained in scoliosis-specific techniques. 1
Curves >50° (Severe)
- Refer for surgical evaluation due to documented risk of continued progression at approximately 1° per year even in skeletally mature adults 1, 4
- Thoracic curves >50° demonstrate predictable annual progression of 1° despite skeletal maturity 4
- Surgery becomes medically necessary when curves exceed 50° threshold, show documented progression despite maturity, cause significant refractory pain, or create substantial quality-of-life impairment 4
Special Considerations for Adult Females
Female patients require heightened vigilance due to higher progression risk and osteoporosis susceptibility. 1
Osteoporosis Management
- Screen earlier with DXA scanning compared to general population 1
- Initiate bisphosphonate therapy following standard osteoporosis guidelines 1
- Osteoporosis accelerates curve progression, particularly in post-menopausal women, through asymmetric vertebral fractures and increased asymmetric loading 5
Monitoring Strategy
Avoid routine scheduled repeat radiographs in stable patients already on treatment to minimize radiation exposure. 1 Follow recommended intervals: every 12-18 months for stable curves <15°, more frequently for 15-50° curves showing any progression. 1
Symptom-Specific Management
Pain Management
For symptomatic patients with back or radicular pain:
- Physical therapy remains first-line treatment 1
- Avoid spinal manipulation with high-velocity thrusts in patients with prior spinal fusion or advanced osteoporosis due to fracture risk, spinal cord injury risk, and potential paraplegia 1
Degenerative Changes
Adult scoliosis often involves asymmetric disc and facet joint arthritis, creating a vicious cycle where asymmetric degeneration leads to increased asymmetric loading, further progression, and potential spinal stenosis. 5 This pathomechanism is particularly relevant in primary degenerative ("de novo") scoliosis and progressive idiopathic curves. 5
Pre-Surgical Evaluation (When Indicated)
For curves >50° requiring surgical consultation:
- MRI of entire spine is mandatory before any surgical intervention to rule out neural axis abnormalities, which occur in >20% of severe curves and alter surgical planning 4
- Assess curve flexibility with side bending or traction radiographs 4
- Document any neurological findings requiring intervention 4
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not overtreat stable curves with unnecessary interventions 1
- Do not delay evaluation of new or worsening symptoms, particularly neurological changes 1
- Do not expose patients to excessive radiation by deviating from recommended monitoring intervals 1
- Do not ignore osteoporosis screening in post-menopausal women, as bone loss accelerates curve progression 1
- Do not use Cobb angle alone to assess post-operative fusion status if surgery has been performed; inter-spinous process distance measurements are superior for detecting pseudarthrosis (sensitivity 91%, specificity 89% vs. 82%/39% for Cobb angle) 4