How should I assess aortic valve stenosis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 25, 2026 • View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Assessment of Aortic Valve Stenosis

Transthoracic echocardiography is the primary diagnostic tool for assessing aortic stenosis, with severity determined by an integrated approach using peak aortic jet velocity, mean transvalvular gradient, and aortic valve area, supplemented by flow status and left ventricular function. 1

Initial Diagnostic Approach

Clinical Evaluation

  • Look for specific physical findings: systolic ejection murmur (grade ≥3/6), single or paradoxically split S2, and delayed/diminished carotid upstroke 2
  • Key symptom to elicit: effort syncope has 100% positive predictive value for significant stenosis 3
  • Perform TTE when: systolic murmur grade ≥3/6, single S2, or symptoms potentially attributable to AS are present 2

Transthoracic Echocardiography Protocol

Anatomic Assessment 1

  • Use short- and long-axis views to identify:
    • Number of cusps (bicuspid vs. tricuspid)
    • Cusp mobility, thickness, and calcification severity
    • Level of obstruction (subvalvular, valvular, or supravalvular)
  • Bicuspid valve diagnosis: most reliable when two cusps are seen in systole with only two commissures framing an elliptical systolic orifice 1

Hemodynamic Measurements 4, 2

  • Peak aortic jet velocity: Obtain from multiple acoustic windows (apical, right parasternal, suprasternal) using continuous-wave Doppler; record the highest velocity observed 4
  • Mean transvalvular gradient: Calculate by averaging instantaneous gradients throughout the entire ejection period 4
  • Aortic valve area (AVA): Calculate using continuity equation
  • LVOT diameter: Measure at the base of aortic valve cusps or 1-5 mm below using zoomed view providing the largest diameter 1

Severity Classification

Standard Criteria for Severe AS 4, 2, 5

Parameter Severe AS Threshold
Peak velocity ≥4.0 m/s
Mean gradient ≥40 mmHg
AVA <1.0 cm²
Indexed AVA <0.6 cm²/m²
Velocity ratio <0.25

Meeting ANY ONE of these criteria defines severe AS 5

Flow Status Determination 4, 5

  • Stroke volume index (SVi):
    • Normal flow: SVi ≥35 mL/m²
    • Low flow: SVi <35 mL/m²
  • Critical interpretation: If AVA <1.0 cm² with normal flow (SVi ≥35 mL/m²), severe AS is very unlikely; this usually reflects LVOT diameter measurement error 4

Algorithmic Approach to Discordant Findings

High-Gradient AS (Velocity ≥4 m/s AND Mean Gradient ≥40 mmHg)

  • Confirms severe AS; no further testing required 4, 5
  • Exception: Check for high-flow states (SVi >58 mL/m²) from anemia, hyperthyroidism, arteriovenous shunts, or significant aortic regurgitation, which can produce high gradients despite only moderate stenosis 4

Low-Gradient AS (Velocity <4 m/s OR Mean Gradient <40 mmHg)

Step 1: Assess AVA and Flow Status 4

  • If AVA ≥1.0 cm²: Moderate AS (not severe)
  • If AVA <1.0 cm² with normal flow (SVi ≥35 mL/m²): Re-measure LVOT diameter (likely measurement error)
  • If AVA <1.0 cm² with low flow (SVi <35 mL/m²): Proceed to Step 2

Step 2: Assess Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Low-Flow, Low-Gradient AS with Reduced LVEF (<50%) 4, 5

  • Perform low-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) to distinguish true-severe from pseudo-severe AS 4, 2
  • DSE interpretation:
    • True severe AS: AVA remains ≤1.0 cm² AND either velocity ≥4 m/s OR mean gradient ≥30-40 mmHg at any flow level 4
    • Pseudo-severe AS: AVA increases to >1.0 cm² with dobutamine 4
    • Contractile reserve present: ≥20% stroke volume increase predicts better surgical outcomes 4, 5
    • Contractile reserve absent: Failure to achieve ≥20% stroke volume increase predicts higher surgical mortality, though valve replacement may still benefit 4

Paradoxical Low-Flow, Low-Gradient AS with Preserved LVEF (≥50%) 4, 5

  • Typical patient: Elderly with concentric hypertrophy, small LV cavity, restrictive physiology 4
  • Diagnostic criteria (ALL must be present):
    • Clinical: Physical findings compatible with severe AS, typical symptoms, age >70 years 4
    • Qualitative imaging: LV hypertrophy 4
    • Quantitative imaging: Mean gradient 30-40 mmHg under normotensive conditions, AVA ≤0.8 cm², low flow confirmed by non-Doppler techniques 4

Primary confirmatory test: CT aortic valve calcium scoring 4, 2

Sex Calcium Score (Agatston units) Interpretation
Men ≥3000 Severe AS very likely
Women ≥1600 Severe AS very likely
Men ≥2000 Severe AS likely
Women ≥1200 Severe AS likely
Men <1600 Severe AS unlikely
Women <800 Severe AS unlikely
  • Avoid dobutamine stress echo in paradoxical low-flow AS due to risk of misleading results 4

Additional Measurements and Considerations

Dimensionless Index (Velocity Ratio) 4, 5

  • Calculation: LVOT velocity / AS velocity
  • Advantage: Less flow-dependent than AVA
  • Severe AS threshold: <0.25
  • Particularly useful during DSE to track changes in stenosis severity 4

Complementary Assessments 1, 2

  • Record systolic blood pressure at every examination (optimal <140 mmHg); hypertension can artificially lower velocity and gradient 1, 4
  • Measure ascending aorta diameter: Small ascending aorta (<30 mm) causes pressure recovery, leading to Doppler overestimation of gradient compared to catheterization 1
  • Calculate valvuloarterial impedance (Zva): Estimates global (valvular + vascular) hemodynamic load 1
  • Assess LV mass and relative wall thickness: Normal LV mass/geometry makes severe AS unlikely 1

When to Use Alternative Imaging 1, 2, 6

  • Transesophageal echocardiography: When transthoracic image quality is suboptimal 1
  • 3D echocardiography, cardiac CT, or CMR: To confirm low flow when Doppler measurements are borderline 4
  • Multislice CT: For valve calcification assessment when echocardiographic findings are discordant 2
  • Cardiac MRI: For flow assessment and LV function evaluation when echocardiographic images are suboptimal 2

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

Most Common Errors 4, 5

  • LVOT diameter underestimation (measuring too distal, >5-10 mm below annulus): Most frequent error, leads to stroke volume underestimation and overestimation of stenosis severity 1, 4
  • Inadequate Doppler alignment (non-parallel beam): Underestimates velocity and may falsely downgrade severity 4, 5
  • Hypertension effects: Can artificially lower peak velocity and mean gradient; always record blood pressure and measure gradients when patient is normotensive for paradoxical low-flow AS 4, 5

Resolution of Discordant Parameters 4

  • When velocity/gradient and AVA are discordant, prioritize velocity and gradient over AVA if Doppler measurements are technically sound
  • Verify LVOT diameter measurement and Doppler alignment before accepting discordant findings

Follow-Up Intervals 2

  • Asymptomatic severe AS: Echocardiography every year
  • Moderate AS: Echocardiography every 1-2 years
  • Mild AS: Echocardiography every 3-5 years

References

1
Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

2
Guideline

Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Stenosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

4
Guideline

Severe Aortic Stenosis: Echocardiographic Diagnostic Criteria

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

5
Guideline

Classification and Diagnosis of Severe Aortic Stenosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

6
Research

Assessment of Aortic Valve Disease: Role of Imaging Modalities.

Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2015

Related Questions

What are the echocardiographic criteria for diagnosing aortic stenosis?
How is the severity of aortic stenosis (AS) classified by valve area?
How is the severity of aortic stenosis graded by echocardiography (echo) in patients with suspected aortic stenosis?
How to measure severity in aortic stenosis?
What management is recommended for a patient with a congenital 21st aortic valve issue?
Is trazodone safe to use after cardiac surgery?
What is the appropriate treatment for a newly diagnosed supraventricular arrhythmia (e.g., atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or AV‑node re‑entrant tachycardia) in an otherwise healthy adult?
A 26‑year‑old woman with isolated ACTH deficiency on hydrocortisone presents with migraines, upper‑field visual loss, left ptosis, intermittent right‑sided CSF rhinorrhea and an empty‑sella appearance on non‑contrast MRI; what is the most likely diagnosis and how should it be confirmed and managed?
Do pregnant patients with syphilis and a severe IgE‑mediated penicillin allergy require penicillin desensitization before each dose of penicillin?
How should I evaluate and manage a new‑onset headache in a man in his late 80s, including red‑flag assessment and first‑line treatment options?
What is the recommended adult dose of acyclovir for treating herpes simplex virus infection in patients with normal renal function?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.

Ask Question