What is the management plan for a 66-year-old male with acute ischemic stroke due to right M2 occlusion and a confirmed NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) score of 2?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: July 9, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management Plan for Acute Ischemic Stroke with Right M2 Occlusion and NIHSS 2

The patient with a right M2 occlusion and confirmed NIHSS score of 2 should receive intravenous thrombolysis (alteplase) if within the appropriate time window, followed by careful monitoring for neurological deterioration, but does not require endovascular therapy given the mild deficit.

Initial Assessment and Discrepancy Resolution

The overnight nurse's NIHSS assessment of 4 versus the neurology resident's confirmed score of 2 highlights the importance of proper NIHSS certification. This discrepancy should be documented, with the neurologist's assessment taking precedence as they typically have more specialized training in neurological examination.

  • NIHSS is a standardized, validated instrument that assesses stroke severity with high inter-rater reliability when performed by certified examiners 1
  • The confirmed NIHSS score of 2 indicates a mild deficit with good prognosis (scores <6 forecast good recovery) 1

Treatment Algorithm Based on NIHSS and Occlusion Location

Step 1: Intravenous Thrombolysis

  • Administer intravenous alteplase if patient is within 4.5 hours from symptom onset and has no contraindications 1
  • Consider tenecteplase as an alternative thrombolytic agent, which has improved fibrin-specificity and can be administered as a single bolus 1

Step 2: Endovascular Therapy Decision

  • For this patient with NIHSS 2 and M2 occlusion: Endovascular therapy is NOT recommended
    • Evidence suggests that endovascular therapy may pose an unfavorable risk-benefit profile over medical management for patients with mild symptoms (NIHSS ≤6) 2
    • Patients with mild symptoms who undergo endovascular therapy demonstrate increased overall rates of intracranial hemorrhage (35.3% vs. 10.0%) and longer hospital stays 2

Step 3: Monitoring and Supportive Care

  • Implement close neurological monitoring for potential deterioration
  • If deterioration occurs, reassess for potential rescue endovascular therapy 2
  • Perform swallow screening before initiating oral intake to prevent aspiration 1
  • Early mobilization to prevent complications 1

Secondary Prevention

  • Initiate antiplatelet therapy (typically aspirin) before discharge 1
  • Address modifiable risk factors:
    • Hypertension management
    • Lipid-lowering therapy
    • Diabetes management if applicable
    • Smoking cessation if applicable 1

Prognosis and Expected Outcomes

  • Patients with NIHSS <6 have a high likelihood of good recovery 1
  • M2 occlusions with low NIHSS scores (<9) have significantly better outcomes:
    • Good outcome rate of 78.4% (vs. 22.6% for NIHSS ≥9)
    • Mortality rate of only 2.7% (vs. 42% for NIHSS ≥9) 3

Pitfalls and Caveats

  1. Beware of neurological deterioration: Despite initial mild symptoms, M2 occlusions can worsen. Implement frequent neurological checks.

  2. NIHSS assessment accuracy: Ensure all staff are properly trained and certified in NIHSS assessment to avoid discrepancies 1.

  3. Avoid overtreatment: Endovascular therapy in mild strokes may lead to higher complication rates without clear benefit 2.

  4. Don't underestimate M2 occlusions: While this patient has mild symptoms, M2 occlusions constitute approximately 4% of all acute ischemic strokes and can cause significant morbidity in those with higher NIHSS scores 3.

  5. Consider perfusion imaging: In borderline cases, perfusion imaging may help identify patients with target-mismatch profiles who might benefit from more aggressive treatment 2.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Endovascular versus medical therapy for large-vessel anterior occlusive stroke presenting with mild symptoms.

International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society, 2020

Related Questions

What is the current recommendation for acute therapy in patients with peripheral M2 (Middle Cerebral Artery) occlusion and acute ischemic stroke, based on NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) score?
What are the blood pressure goals and management for cerebral infarction due to Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery (PICA) occlusion?
What is the best treatment for an M2 occlusion with NIHSS 5 within 4.5 hours of stroke onset?
What is the management approach for ischemic CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident) based on NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) score?
What is the recommended blood pressure management strategy for a patient presenting with a stroke and a computed tomography angiogram (CTA) showing intracranial carotid artery dissection involving the internal carotid artery (ICA)?
What are the recommended labs, imaging, and treatment for a patient with stomach pain upon waking?
Should vitamin D deficiency be treated if serum calcium levels are normal?
What to do when a patient experiences a vagal response?
What are the diagnostic and treatment approaches for a 61-year-old patient with a knee injury after a traffic accident, presenting with severe pain and a history of asthma, hemorrhoids, and previous cholecystectomy and liver tumor removal?
What are the treatment options for Restless Leg Syndrome (RLS), including the use of leg wraps and other devices?
What are the risks and prescribing details of non-FDA (Food and Drug Administration) approved bioidentical hormone therapies?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.