Does the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) use continuous chest compressions?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 8, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

NRP Does NOT Use Continuous Chest Compressions

No, the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) does not recommend continuous chest compressions. Instead, NRP uses coordinated compressions and ventilations at a 3:1 ratio (3 compressions followed by 1 ventilation), delivering 90 compressions and 30 breaths to achieve approximately 120 events per minute. 1

The Standard NRP Approach to Chest Compressions

Coordinated 3:1 Compression-to-Ventilation Ratio

  • The NRP explicitly recommends coordinating compressions and ventilations to avoid simultaneous delivery, maintaining the traditional 3:1 ratio where compressions are paused for ventilation 1

  • This approach delivers 90 compressions and 30 breaths per minute, totaling approximately 120 events per minute 1

  • Each event is allotted approximately 0.5 seconds, with exhalation occurring during the first compression after each ventilation 1, 2

Rationale for the 3:1 Ratio

  • Ventilation is prioritized as the most effective action in neonatal resuscitation because bradycardia in newborns is nearly always the result of inadequate lung inflation or profound hypoxemia, not primary cardiac pathology 1, 2

  • The 3:1 ratio is specifically designed to maximize ventilation at an achievable rate, recognizing that gas exchange compromise is the primary cause of cardiovascular collapse in neonates 1

  • Chest compressions are only indicated when the heart rate remains below 60 beats per minute despite 30 seconds of adequate ventilation with supplemental oxygen 1, 2

Exception: Cardiac Etiology

  • NRP guidelines acknowledge that rescuers may consider using higher ratios (e.g., 15:2) if the arrest is believed to be of cardiac origin rather than respiratory 1

  • This represents the only scenario where deviation from the 3:1 ratio is mentioned, but this still involves coordinated (not continuous) compressions

Emerging Research vs. Current Guidelines

Animal Studies on Continuous Compressions

While recent animal research has explored continuous chest compressions with asynchronous ventilation (CCCaV), these findings have not been incorporated into NRP guidelines:

  • A 2021 lamb study found that continuous compressions at 120/min with asynchronous ventilation increased carotid blood flow and cerebral oxygen delivery compared to 3:1 3

  • A 2024 preterm lamb study using continuous compressions with high-frequency percussive ventilation showed improved gas exchange and cerebral oxygen delivery, though no difference in return of spontaneous circulation 4

Why Guidelines Haven't Changed

  • These are pre-clinical animal studies only - the authors themselves acknowledge that neurodevelopmental outcomes and tissue injury studies are warranted before clinical trials 3, 4

  • Current NRP guidelines from 2015 remain the standard of care, emphasizing the proven 3:1 coordinated approach 1

  • The 3:1 ratio has been consistently supported through multiple guideline iterations (2010 and 2015) 1

Key Technical Points

Compression Technique

  • The 2-thumb encircling hands technique is preferred over the 2-finger technique because it generates higher blood pressure and coronary perfusion pressure with less rescuer fatigue 1

  • Compressions are delivered on the lower third of the sternum to a depth of approximately one-third of the anterior-posterior diameter of the chest 1

  • The chest should be allowed to re-expand fully during relaxation, but the rescuer's thumbs should not leave the chest 1

Critical Pitfall to Avoid

  • Do not start chest compressions until you have ensured that ventilation is being delivered optimally - inadequate ventilation is the most common reason for persistent bradycardia, and compressions may actually compete with effective ventilation 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.