What is the differential diagnosis of Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: November 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Differential Diagnosis of Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF)

The differential diagnosis of ACLF primarily involves distinguishing between precipitating factors (hepatic vs. non-hepatic insults), identifying the specific organ failures present, and excluding mimics such as acute liver failure, stable decompensated cirrhosis, and acute tubular necrosis. 1

Primary Diagnostic Framework

When evaluating a patient with suspected ACLF, the differential diagnosis must address three key questions:

1. Is This Actually ACLF or a Mimic?

ACLF must be distinguished from:

  • Acute liver failure (ALF) - occurs without pre-existing chronic liver disease, whereas ACLF requires underlying chronic liver disease with or without cirrhosis 1, 2
  • Stable decompensated cirrhosis - patients with complications who do not develop organ failures or who are discharged without readmission during 3-month follow-up 2
  • Unstable decompensated cirrhosis - patients with liver-related complications requiring readmission but not meeting ACLF organ failure criteria 2
  • Acute decompensation without organ failure - acute worsening (ascites, encephalopathy, GI bleeding, jaundice, infections) but without meeting organ failure thresholds 1

2. What Is the Precipitating Factor?

The differential of precipitating events divides into hepatic and non-hepatic insults:

Type I ACLF: Non-Hepatic Precipitants (60% of cases) 3

  • Infections/sepsis (most common, 47% of Type I cases) - bacterial infections including spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, pneumonia, urinary tract infections, and bloodstream infections 1, 3
  • Gastrointestinal bleeding - variceal or non-variceal hemorrhage causing hemodynamic instability 1, 4
  • Surgery or trauma - major surgical procedures or traumatic injury 1
  • Hemodynamic derangements - shock states from any cause 1

Type II ACLF: Hepatic Precipitants (40% of cases) 3

  • Acute alcoholic hepatitis (most common hepatic precipitant, 29% of all ACLF cases) - active alcohol consumption in patients with underlying alcoholic liver disease 3, 4
  • Acute viral hepatitis superimposed on chronic liver disease:
    • Hepatitis E virus (HEV) superinfection 3
    • Hepatitis A virus (HAV) superinfection 3
    • Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation or flare 1, 5
  • Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) - hepatotoxic medications or herbal supplements 1
  • Autoimmune hepatitis flare - may require transjugular liver biopsy for diagnosis 1, 6
  • Ischemic hepatitis - though bilirubin is usually <3 mg/dL despite marked transaminase elevation 6

Critical caveat: In 40-50% of ACLF cases, no identifiable precipitating event can be found despite thorough investigation 7, 8, 4

3. Which Organ Failures Are Present?

The differential diagnosis of specific organ dysfunctions in ACLF includes:

Renal Failure Differential 1

  • Hepatorenal syndrome-AKI (HRS-AKI) - functional renal failure meeting ICA criteria: Stage 2+ AKI, no response to volume expansion with albumin 1 g/kg × 2 days, absence of shock, no nephrotoxic drugs, no proteinuria >500 mg/day, no microhematuria >50 RBC/hpf, normal renal ultrasound 1
  • Prerenal azotemia (PRA) - accounts for 50% of AKI in cirrhosis, responds to volume expansion 1
  • Acute tubular necrosis (ATN) - accounts for 35% of AKI in cirrhosis, evidenced by urinary casts, hematuria, proteinuria 1, 2
  • Acute glomerulonephritis - rare, identified by urinalysis showing hematuria and proteinuria 1
  • Acute interstitial nephritis - rare, may be drug-related 1

Key diagnostic approach: Urinalysis and urine microscopy differentiate functional (HRS-AKI, PRA) from structural (ATN, glomerulonephritis) causes 1

Hepatic Failure Differential

  • Progressive cirrhosis - bilirubin 6-12 mg/dL indicates liver failure by CLIF-SOFA criteria 1, 5
  • Massive hepatic necrosis - HBV flare causing marked transaminase elevation and coagulopathy 1
  • Wilson's disease with hemolysis - markedly elevated bilirubin with predominant indirect fraction, requires urgent transplant evaluation 6, 5

Cerebral Failure Differential

  • Hepatic encephalopathy Grade III-IV - defines cerebral failure in ACLF 1, 5
  • Structural brain lesions - must be excluded with imaging if focal neurologic signs present 1
  • Metabolic encephalopathy - from uremia, hypoglycemia, or electrolyte disturbances 1
  • Septic encephalopathy - associated with systemic infection 4

Coagulation Failure Differential

  • Liver synthetic dysfunction - INR ≥2.5 or platelets ≤20,000/mm³ defines coagulation failure 1, 5
  • Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) - may complicate sepsis in ACLF 4
  • Hemolysis - particularly in Wilson's disease presenting as acute liver failure 6

Circulatory Failure Differential

  • Distributive shock - most common in ACLF, requiring vasopressor support 1, 5
  • Hypovolemic shock - from GI bleeding 1
  • Septic shock - from bacterial infections 4
  • Cardiogenic shock - rare but must be excluded 1

Respiratory Failure Differential

  • Hepatopulmonary syndrome - PaO₂/FiO₂ ≤200 or SpO₂/FiO₂ ≤214 defines respiratory failure 1, 5
  • Aspiration pneumonia - risk increased with hepatic encephalopathy 5
  • Fluid overload/pulmonary edema - particularly with aggressive albumin administration 9
  • Pleural effusion (hepatic hydrothorax) - occurs in 5.5% of ACLF patients 9
  • Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) - may complicate sepsis 4

ACLF Grade Differential

Once ACLF is confirmed, grading determines prognosis and management:

  • ACLF Grade 1a - single kidney failure (creatinine ≥2 mg/dL) 1, 5
  • ACLF Grade 1b - single non-kidney organ failure with creatinine 1.5-1.9 mg/dL and/or hepatic encephalopathy Grade 1-2 1, 5
  • ACLF Grade 2 - two organ failures, 28-day mortality 32% 1
  • ACLF Grade 3 - three or more organ failures, 28-day mortality 78% 1, 5

Common Diagnostic Pitfalls

  • Failing to recognize non-hepatic precipitants - infections and sepsis are the most common triggers but may be subtle; always obtain blood cultures, urinalysis, diagnostic paracentesis, and chest imaging 1, 3
  • Misclassifying stable decompensated cirrhosis as ACLF - ACLF requires organ failure by CLIF-SOFA criteria, not just decompensation events 1, 2
  • Overlooking HBV reactivation - check HBV DNA in all patients with known or newly diagnosed hepatitis B 5
  • Assuming all AKI is HRS-AKI - urinalysis is mandatory to differentiate functional from structural renal disease 1
  • Missing Wilson's disease - consider in younger patients with hemolysis, marked indirect hyperbilirubinemia, and coagulopathy 6, 5
  • Attributing respiratory failure solely to ACLF - fluid overload from excessive albumin administration is a preventable cause; ACLF Grade 3 patients are at highest risk 9
  • Not recognizing autoimmune hepatitis flare - may require transjugular liver biopsy in the setting of severe coagulopathy 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Hepatic Failure Classification and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnostic Criteria and Management of Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Acute Liver Failure Diagnostic Criteria and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.