What is the role of heparin (unfractionated heparin) in hemodialysis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 25, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Heparin in Hemodialysis

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the standard anticoagulant for hemodialysis, administered as an initial bolus of 25-50 units/kg followed by continuous infusion of 500-1500 units/hour, and it remains the preferred choice due to its low cost, proven efficacy, reversibility, and lack of need for dose adjustment in renal impairment. 1, 2

Standard Heparin Protocol for Routine Hemodialysis

Dosing regimen:

  • Initial bolus: 25-50 units/kg administered a few minutes before connecting the patient to the extracorporeal circuit 1, 3
  • Continuous infusion: 500-1500 units/hour during the dialysis session 1
  • Timing: Stop the heparin infusion 30-60 minutes before the end of dialysis to minimize bleeding at needle puncture sites 3

Key advantages of UFH:

  • Does not require dose adjustment for renal impairment as metabolism is primarily hepatic 4
  • Not cleared by dialysis itself 1
  • Can be reversed with protamine sulfate if bleeding occurs 5
  • Decades of clinical experience demonstrating safety and effectiveness 3, 6

Monitoring Anticoagulation

For routine outpatient hemodialysis, laboratory monitoring is NOT routinely indicated and most centers use a pragmatic approach based on visual inspection 7, 3:

  • Inspect the dialyzer header and venous air detector chamber for clots during treatment 3
  • Assess time to hemostasis at needle puncture sites after treatment 3
  • Adjust doses based on these clinical observations rather than laboratory values 3

When laboratory monitoring IS indicated (select high-risk patients only) 7:

  • Patients with extremes of body weight
  • History of repeated circuit clotting
  • History of bleeding complications
  • Target aPTT: 1.5 to 2.5 times normal value 4, 5
  • Alternative monitoring: activated clotting time (ACT) or anti-factor Xa levels 7

Alternative Anticoagulation Strategies

For Patients with High Bleeding Risk

Regional citrate anticoagulation is the preferred alternative for patients at high bleeding risk or those who cannot receive heparin 1, 8:

  • Provides anticoagulation only within the extracorporeal circuit
  • Avoids systemic anticoagulation of the patient 9
  • Requires equipment that supports citrate protocols 4

Heparin-free dialysis may be performed in patients with active bleeding 6:

  • Use saline flushes to maintain circuit patency 5
  • Requires careful monitoring for circuit clotting 6
  • Consider modifications to dialyzer membranes and dialysate composition 9

For Patients with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT)

For acute HIT requiring dialysis, use argatroban as first-line alternative 5, 1, 4:

  • Bolus dose: 250 μg/kg for intermittent hemodialysis or 100 μg/kg for continuous hemodialysis 1, 4
  • Continuous infusion: Adjusted based on aPTT monitoring (target aPTT 50-60 seconds) 5
  • Rationale: Argatroban is not renally cleared and dialytic clearance by high-flux membranes is clinically insignificant 5, 1
  • Safety profile: Low rates of new thrombosis (0%-4%) and major bleeding (0%-6%) 1

Danaparoid is an acceptable alternative 5, 1, 4:

  • Bolus dose: 3,750 units (2,500 units if weight <55 kg) before the first two sessions, then 3,000 units (2,000 units if weight <55 kg) for subsequent sessions 1, 4
  • Caution: Accumulates in renal failure due to renal clearance, making it less ideal than argatroban 5, 1

For subacute, remote, or past HIT, regional citrate anticoagulation is preferred over argatroban or danaparoid 1:

  • Citrate is not appropriate for acute HIT patients who require systemic anticoagulation 1

Low Molecular Weight Heparins (LMWHs)

LMWHs can be used but require careful consideration 1, 10:

  • May be given as a single initial bolus injection, generally adequate 10
  • Critical limitation: Contraindicated or require dose adjustment when creatinine clearance <30 mL/min 1
  • Bleeding risk: Up to twice as high in severe renal impairment 1
  • Monitoring required: Anti-Xa level monitoring recommended to avoid accumulation 1, 7
  • Avoid standard LMWH doses in dialysis patients without anti-Xa monitoring due to severe bleeding risk from accumulation 1

Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them

Inadequate mixing of heparin with blood:

  • Administer the bolus a few minutes BEFORE connecting the patient to the circuit 3
  • Ensure thorough mixing of the heparin infusion with blood flow 3
  • Heparin is negatively charged and binds to plasma proteins, leukocytes, and plastic, requiring adequate mixing for optimal anticoagulation 3

Dilution of blood samples:

  • When drawing predialysis BUN samples from catheters, withdraw and discard 10 mL (adults) or 3-5 mL (pediatrics) before collecting the sample 5
  • Prevents contamination with heparin or saline that would falsely lower measurements 5

Inappropriate use of warfarin or DOACs:

  • For systemic anticoagulation needs (e.g., atrial fibrillation), apixaban is preferred over warfarin in dialysis patients 1
  • Rivaroxaban and dabigatran should be avoided due to increased major bleeding risk 1
  • Warfarin shows no stroke reduction benefit but increases bleeding risk in ESRD patients 1

Failure to stop heparin infusion early enough:

  • Stop infusion 30-60 minutes before end of treatment to allow adequate hemostasis at access sites 3
  • Adjust timing based on individual patient bleeding tendency 3

References

Guideline

Anticoagulation in Dialysis Patients

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Optimization of heparin anticoagulation for hemodialysis.

Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis, 2011

Guideline

Anticoagulation Protocols in Chronic Hemodialysis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Anticoagulation in intermittent hemodialysis: pathways, protocols, and pitfalls.

The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice, 2011

Guideline

Managing Heparin Bolus During Dialysis in Patients with High Bleeding Risk

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.