In adult septic shock, when is low‑dose hydrocortisone (200 mg per day) indicated and what do current guidelines recommend regarding its use?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: February 11, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Steroids in Sepsis: Savior or Villain?

When to Use Hydrocortisone: The Critical Threshold

Hydrocortisone 200 mg/day is indicated only when septic shock remains refractory to adequate fluid resuscitation (≥30 mL/kg crystalloid) and moderate-to-high dose vasopressors (norepinephrine >0.1–0.2 µg/kg/min) for more than 60 minutes. 1 This narrow indication represents the consensus position where steroids shift from potential villain to potential savior.

The 2012 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines frame this as a conditional recommendation: do not use hydrocortisone if adequate fluid resuscitation and vasopressor therapy restore hemodynamic stability; only when this fails should you consider intravenous hydrocortisone at 200 mg per day. 2 This recommendation carries a Grade 2C rating, reflecting moderate-quality evidence with important caveats.

The Evidence: Why the Narrow Window Matters

The mortality benefit of steroids is confined to the sickest patients. The landmark French trial by Annane (2002) demonstrated a 10% absolute mortality reduction (53% vs 63%, hazard ratio 0.67) in patients with vasopressor-unresponsive shock and relative adrenal insufficiency. 1 However, the subsequent CORTICUS trial showed no mortality benefit when steroids were given to all septic shock patients regardless of vasopressor responsiveness, underscoring that benefit exists only in refractory shock. 1

The baseline mortality difference between these trials is striking: 61% in the French study versus 31% in CORTICUS. 1 This disparity confirms that steroids help only when shock severity crosses a critical threshold—specifically, when patients require escalating vasopressors despite optimal resuscitation.

Recent evidence from the ADRENAL and APROCCHSS trials provides conflicting signals on mortality, likely due to differences in patient selection and corticosteroid regimens. 3 However, both trials consistently show that hydrocortisone accelerates shock reversal (hazard ratio ≈1.9 for earlier vasopressor discontinuation) and reduces total vasopressor requirements. 1 A 2023 prospective study found that early initiation (≤3 hours) reduced time to vasopressor discontinuation by 12 hours compared to late initiation (25 vs 37 hours, p=0.009). 4

Practical Dosing and Administration

  • Standard regimen: Hydrocortisone 200 mg/day as a continuous IV infusion (preferred) or 50 mg IV every 6 hours. 1, 5 Continuous infusion is favored for steady plasma levels, though clinical outcomes are similar. 2

  • Do not add fludrocortisone. A 2024 network meta-analysis found no improvement in shock-free days, shock duration, or mortality when fludrocortisone was combined with hydrocortisone. 1 While one 2024 systematic review suggested fludrocortisone plus hydrocortisone might reduce mortality (RR 0.88,94.2% probability of superiority), this relied primarily on indirect evidence with only two head-to-head trials, and the finding conflicts with propensity-weighted analyses showing no benefit. 6, 1

  • Duration and tapering: Maintain full-dose hydrocortisone for at least 3 days before considering dose reduction. 1, 5 Begin tapering only after vasopressors are discontinued, tapering gradually over 6–14 days to avoid rebound inflammation and hemodynamic deterioration. 1, 5 Abrupt discontinuation is contraindicated. 1

Critical Pitfalls: When Steroids Become the Villain

  • Do not use the ACTH stimulation test to select patients for hydrocortisone. The CORTICUS trial proved that test results do not predict faster shock resolution or mortality benefit (Grade 2B recommendation against). 2, 1

  • Steroids are contraindicated in sepsis without shock. The benefit is limited to patients requiring vasopressor support (Grade 1D recommendation). 2, 1

  • Avoid high-dose regimens (>400 mg/day). These provide no additional benefit and increase adverse events. 1, 3 Meta-analyses confirm that low-dose regimens (200 mg/day) do not significantly increase superinfection rates, whereas high-dose regimens are associated with excess harm. 1

  • Do not delay appropriate vasopressor escalation. If hydrocortisone is indicated, it should complement—not replace—optimal vasopressor therapy. Norepinephrine remains the first-line vasopressor, with vasopressin 0.03 units/minute added for refractory hypotension. 2

The Verdict: Conditional Savior in Refractory Shock

Hydrocortisone is neither universal savior nor villain—it is a conditional therapy for a specific subset of critically ill patients. The mortality benefit appears greatest in septic shock patients with high vasopressor requirements, evidence of multiorgan failure, and primary lung infections. 3 Steroids consistently accelerate shock reversal and may shorten mechanical ventilation duration, but do not improve mortality in unselected septic shock populations. 3, 7

The practical algorithm: After administering ≥30 mL/kg crystalloid and initiating norepinephrine targeting MAP ≥65 mmHg, if the patient requires norepinephrine >0.1–0.2 µg/kg/min for more than 60 minutes, start hydrocortisone 200 mg/day as a continuous infusion. 1, 5 Continue full-dose therapy for at least 3 days, then taper gradually over 6–14 days after vasopressors are discontinued. 1, 5 Monitor for hyperglycemia (the most common adverse effect) but recognize that superinfection risk is not significantly increased at low doses. 1, 3

References

Guideline

Hydrocortisone for Vasopressor‑Refractory Septic Shock

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Low-dose corticosteroids in septic shock: Has the pendulum shifted?

American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, 2019

Guideline

Hydrocortisone Dosing in Septic Shock with Hypotension

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Controversies in Corticosteroid use for Sepsis.

The Journal of emergency medicine, 2017

Related Questions

What is the recommendation for corticosteroid (steroid) use in septic shock patients as per Surviving Sepsis Guidelines (SSG)?
In a patient with septic shock who remains hypotensive after adequate fluid resuscitation and requires vasopressor support, what is the recommended low‑dose corticosteroid regimen, including dose, route, duration, need for taper, and use of fludrocortisone?
What is the recommended dose of corticosteroids (e.g. hydrocortisone) for refractory septic shock?
What is the role of hydrocortisone (cortisol) in the management of sepsis?
What are the indications for corticosteroid (cortico-steroid) therapy in sepsis?
What is the recommended IV infusion rate, maximum single dose, and administration protocol for protamine sulfate when neutralizing heparin?
Summarize the randomized controlled trial comparing fast versus slow induction of propofol using target‑controlled infusion in ASA I‑III adult patients undergoing elective surgery, including predicted effect‑site concentrations, hemodynamic changes, and respiratory events.
For Candida balanitis, is miconazole 2% cream preferred over ketoconazole 2% cream, and what is the recommended dosing regimen?
What is the safest first‑line analgesic for a near‑term pregnant woman with chronic glomerulonephritis?
In geriatric patients, does a slow, titrated induction of anesthesia reduce intra‑operative electroencephalogram burst‑suppression and produce EEG patterns resembling those of younger adults, and what anesthetic techniques (e.g., reduced propofol or volatile agent dosing, adjunct dexmedetomidine, multimodal analgesia) are recommended to achieve this?
In a patient with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and persistently elevated white blood cell count with neutrophilia, should antibiotics be initiated?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.