What is the best indicator of adequate resuscitation in septic shock?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: May 19, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The best indicator of adequate resuscitation in septic shock is decreased lactate level (option E). When treating septic shock, monitoring lactate clearance provides the most reliable evidence that tissue perfusion is improving and that resuscitation efforts are effective. During septic shock, tissues experience hypoperfusion and switch to anaerobic metabolism, producing lactate. As resuscitation improves oxygen delivery to tissues, lactate levels decrease, indicating restoration of aerobic metabolism. While normal blood pressure, pulse, urine output, and improved mental status are important clinical parameters to monitor, they may normalize before tissue perfusion is fully restored. Lactate clearance (typically aiming for >10-20% reduction within the first few hours) directly reflects improvement at the cellular level and has been shown to correlate with improved outcomes, as demonstrated by a significant reduction in mortality in lactate-guided resuscitation compared to resuscitation without lactate monitoring (RR 0.67; 95% CI 0.53–0.84; low quality) 1. Serial lactate measurements should be obtained during resuscitation, with decreasing levels confirming that the interventions are effectively addressing the underlying tissue hypoxia that characterizes septic shock. Some studies suggest guiding resuscitation to normalize lactate in patients with elevated lactate levels as a marker of tissue hypoperfusion (weak recommendation, low quality of evidence) 1. However, the most recent and highest quality study supports the use of lactate clearance as a key indicator of adequate resuscitation 1. Key points to consider when using lactate clearance as an indicator of adequate resuscitation include:

  • Lactate levels should be monitored serially during resuscitation
  • A decrease in lactate levels indicates improvement in tissue perfusion
  • Lactate clearance should be used in conjunction with other clinical parameters, such as blood pressure, pulse, and urine output, to guide resuscitation efforts.

From the Research

Indicators of Adequate Resuscitation in Septic Shock

  • The best indicator of adequate resuscitation in septic shock is a topic of ongoing research and debate 2, 3, 4, 5, 6.
  • According to some studies, decreased lactate level is a key indicator of adequate resuscitation, as it reflects improved tissue perfusion and oxygen delivery 2, 4.
  • However, other studies suggest that lactate is an unreliable indicator of tissue hypoxia in injury or sepsis, and that its levels may not correlate with traditional indicators of perfusion 5.
  • Other potential indicators of adequate resuscitation include:
    • Adequate urine output 3
    • Improved mental status 3
    • Normal blood pressure 3
    • Normal pulse 3
    • Capillary refill time (CRT) 6
  • A multimodal approach to perfusion monitoring, incorporating multiple variables and parameters, may be necessary to optimize resuscitation in septic shock patients 3, 6.
  • The use of parameters such as central venous pressure (CVP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and cardiac output/index, as well as microcirculatory resuscitation endpoints like lactate, central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2), and central venous-arterial CO2 gradient, can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the patient's response to therapy 3.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Clinical use of peripheral perfusion parameters in septic shock.

Current opinion in critical care, 2021

Research

End Points of Sepsis Resuscitation.

Emergency medicine clinics of North America, 2017

Research

Optimal target in septic shock resuscitation.

Annals of translational medicine, 2020

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.